Nintedanib in Post-COVID Interstitial Lung Disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract Rationale The optimal treatment of interstitial lung disease resulting from COVID-19 is unknown. Objectives We sought to investigate the effect of nintedanib, an antifibrotic medication, on interstitial lung disease in participants who survived severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at six sites across the United States. Participants were included if they had evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection that required supplemental oxygen therapy and had interstitial lung disease (ILD) findings on chest imaging ≥ 30 days post-infection. Participants received either nintedanib or placebo (1:1 ratio) for 180 days. Primary outcome was change in forced vital capacity (FVC) at 180 days; other outcomes included changes in chest computed tomography imaging (qualitative and quantitative), six-minute walk distance, and patient-reported outcome measures. Measurements and Main Results In total, 103 of the planned 170 participants were randomized (51 to nintedanib; 52 to placebo); the study closed to enrollment before target sample size was met. FVC at 180 days improved in both nintedanib (+147.55 mL) and placebo groups (+167.72 mL) but were not significantly different (difference, -20.17 mL; 95% CI: -138.54 to 98.20). Similarly, six-minute walk distance, diffusing capacity, qualitative assessments of chest imaging, and patient-reported outcome measures improved in both groups. Quantitative chest imaging, as measured by data-driven textural analysis, showed no difference in fibrotic score changes for those receiving nintedanib or placebo (-4.49 vs -4.06; difference, -0.43; 95% CI: -3.34 to 2.47). Conclusions Administration of nintedanib in this limited trial did not result in improved outcomes for participants with post-COVID-19 ILD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag159
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nintedanib in Post-COVID Interstitial Lung Disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

Nicole Ng, Anna Czinn, Sean J. Callahan, Jigna Zatakia et al.
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
article

Nintedanib in Post-COVID Interstitial Lung Disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

Nicole Ng, Anna Czinn, Sean J. Callahan, Jigna Zatakia, Amy L. Olson, Iván O. Rosas, Valeria Santibañez, Najla Abdurrahman, María L. Padilla, Michele Cohen, Emilia Bagiella, AVANTHIKA WYNN, Susan K. Mathai, Emmanuel Valenza, Ani Cotarlan, Stacey-Ann Brown, Karthik Suresh, Nina Patel, Stephen Humphries, Mary Marks, David Lynch, Peidi Li, Aditi Mathur, Ellen Moquete, Helena Chang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rationale The optimal treatment of interstitial lung disease resulting from COVID-19 is unknown. Objectives We sought to investigate the effect of nintedanib, an antifibrotic medication, on interstitial lung disease in participants who survived severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at six sites across the United States. Participants were included if they had evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection that required supplemental oxygen therapy and had interstitial lung disease (ILD) findings on chest imaging ≥ 30 days post-infection. Participants received either nintedanib or placebo (1:1 ratio) for 180 days. Primary outcome was change in forced vital capacity (FVC) at 180 days; other outcomes included changes in chest computed tomography imaging (qualitative and quantitative), six-minute walk distance, and patient-reported outcome measures. Measurements and Main Results In total, 103 of the planned 170 participants were randomized (51 to nintedanib; 52 to placebo); the study closed to enrollment before target sample size was met. FVC at 180 days improved in both nintedanib (+147.55 mL) and placebo groups (+167.72 mL) but were not significantly different (difference, -20.17 mL; 95% CI: -138.54 to 98.20). Similarly, six-minute walk distance, diffusing capacity, qualitative assessments of chest imaging, and patient-reported outcome measures improved in both groups. Quantitative chest imaging, as measured by data-driven textural analysis, showed no difference in fibrotic score changes for those receiving nintedanib or placebo (-4.49 vs -4.06; difference, -0.43; 95% CI: -3.34 to 2.47). Conclusions Administration of nintedanib in this limited trial did not result in improved outcomes for participants with post-COVID-19 ILD.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Hackensack University Medical Center (US), Emory Healthcare (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Emory University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Baylor University Medical Center (US), National Jewish Health (US), Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US), University of Colorado Denver (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.