‘Teachers’ thinking and deciding fast and slow: a systems framework application’

This theoretical paper applies Kahneman’s (2011) Systems framework to teaching and teacher education. This framework conceptualises thinking in two forms: System 1 and System 2. System 1, thinking fast, relies on feelings, emotions, biases, and intuitions, acting as the autopilot in most routine decision-making, whereas System 2, thinking slow, is deliberate, measured, and reflective. We use the Systems framework to elucidate teachers’ habits of mind and habits of action in the dynamic and unpredictable classroom context. We have organised the ensuing discussion around four areas in which System 1 and System 2 thinking have been distinguished. Specifically, we contrast these systems based on the mental engagement ascribed to each; key mechanisms upon which they operate; the capacity and level of cognition they require; and primary procedures they entail. We regard this framework as a catalyst for pedagogical reappraisal. We explore systematic patterns in the decisions educators make and consider conditions that may trigger more expedient thinking. We then offer guiding principles that can lead to new habits of mind and action. Finally, we discuss how the Systems framework can be enriched and expanded by considering sociocultural, socioemotional, situated, and contextual factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teachers and Teaching
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2026.2691159
Primary Topic
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Teachers’ thinking and deciding fast and slow: a systems framework application’

Nihat Polat, Patricia A. Alexander, Laura J. Mahalingappa
Teachers and Teaching
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
article

‘Teachers’ thinking and deciding fast and slow: a systems framework application’

Nihat Polat, Patricia A. Alexander, Laura J. Mahalingappa
article en

Abstract

This theoretical paper applies Kahneman’s (2011) Systems framework to teaching and teacher education. This framework conceptualises thinking in two forms: System 1 and System 2. System 1, thinking fast, relies on feelings, emotions, biases, and intuitions, acting as the autopilot in most routine decision-making, whereas System 2, thinking slow, is deliberate, measured, and reflective. We use the Systems framework to elucidate teachers’ habits of mind and habits of action in the dynamic and unpredictable classroom context. We have organised the ensuing discussion around four areas in which System 1 and System 2 thinking have been distinguished. Specifically, we contrast these systems based on the mental engagement ascribed to each; key mechanisms upon which they operate; the capacity and level of cognition they require; and primary procedures they entail. We regard this framework as a catalyst for pedagogical reappraisal. We explore systematic patterns in the decisions educators make and consider conditions that may trigger more expedient thinking. We then offer guiding principles that can lead to new habits of mind and action. Finally, we discuss how the Systems framework can be enriched and expanded by considering sociocultural, socioemotional, situated, and contextual factors.

Teachers and Teaching
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.