Advance Care Planning in Indigenous Populations: A Scoping Review

Background: Advance care planning has proven to be beneficial to medical care as it elicits patient preferences at the end of life, yet Indigenous populations have low rates of participation. Objective: This gap map scoping review serves to assess the current literature regarding the prevalence of advance care planning and palliative care characteristics in Indigenous populations of North America and Oceania. Design: Articles were identified from searches performed in five databases spanning the period from 2013 to 2023. Results: Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, representing studies conducted in the United States ( n = 15), Canada ( n = 2), New Zealand ( n = 7), and Australia ( n = 4). The included articles varied in study design, comprising qualitative ( n = 16), observational ( n = 7), mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) ( n = 4), and interventional ( n = 1). Two major findings endorsed across studies were (1) a high frequency of family involvement in end-of-life decision making and (2) awareness of culturally unsafe end-of-life services, creating hesitancy and mistrust. Conclusions: These results map the gaps in the existing research literature exploring the needs and preferences of Indigenous peoples in end-of-life decisions, palliative care, and advance care planning while highlighting a paucity of known effective interventions for Indigenous people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218261460511
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advance Care Planning in Indigenous Populations: A Scoping Review

Lisa M. Quintiliani, Lori Henault, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow, Angelo E. Volandes et al.
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Advance Care Planning in Indigenous Populations: A Scoping Review

Lisa M. Quintiliani, Lori Henault, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow, Angelo E. Volandes, Aretha Delight Davis, Marjorie K. Mau, Kaitlyn Aoki, Emma Pinnow, Martina L. Kamaka
article en

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning has proven to be beneficial to medical care as it elicits patient preferences at the end of life, yet Indigenous populations have low rates of participation. Objective: This gap map scoping review serves to assess the current literature regarding the prevalence of advance care planning and palliative care characteristics in Indigenous populations of North America and Oceania. Design: Articles were identified from searches performed in five databases spanning the period from 2013 to 2023. Results: Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, representing studies conducted in the United States ( n = 15), Canada ( n = 2), New Zealand ( n = 7), and Australia ( n = 4). The included articles varied in study design, comprising qualitative ( n = 16), observational ( n = 7), mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) ( n = 4), and interventional ( n = 1). Two major findings endorsed across studies were (1) a high frequency of family involvement in end-of-life decision making and (2) awareness of culturally unsafe end-of-life services, creating hesitancy and mistrust. Conclusions: These results map the gaps in the existing research literature exploring the needs and preferences of Indigenous peoples in end-of-life decisions, palliative care, and advance care planning while highlighting a paucity of known effective interventions for Indigenous people.

Journal of Palliative Medicine
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Tufts University (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Health Decisions (United States) (US)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.