Diagnostic impact and reproducibility of p53 immunohistochemistry in Barrett's oesophagus: results of the Dutch Esophageal Pathology Panel ( <scp>DEPP</scp> )

INTRODUCTION: Evidence supporting the use of p53 immunohistochemistry (p53-IHC) in Barrett's oesophagus (BE) is largely based on selected series, limiting generalizability. This study evaluates p53-IHC in a nationwide, real-world BE-cohort within a universal healthcare system, assessing concordance with referring hospitals, interobserver agreement (IOA) and its impact on routine diagnostic decisions. METHODS: Revision cases submitted to the Dutch Esophageal Pathology Panel (DEPP) were assessed by trained and experienced pathologists for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-based classification (Vienna classification), p53-IHC patterns (wild-type, overexpression, double clone, null mutation and equivocal) and combined H&E/p53-IHC review. Concordance between referring hospitals and the expert panel (Cohen's kappa) and IOA among panel pathologists (Fleiss' kappa) were assessed, along with the impact of p53-IHC on diagnostic reclassification. RESULTS: A total of 1,146 consecutive patient consultation cases (1,704 biopsy levels) were included, with a median of 12 DEPP pathologist assessments per biopsy. Overall concordance of p53 assessment between referring hospitals and the expert panel was moderate-to-substantial (κ = 0.61, 95% CI 0.58-0.64), with 24.2% of p53-IHC assessments reclassified. IOA among 13 pathologists assessing 316 endoscopic biopsies was substantial (κ = 0.65, 95% CI 0.61-0.69). Ancillary p53-IHC influenced pathologists' decisions across biopsy levels. For non-dysplastic (NDBE) biopsies, aberrant p53-IHC prompted reclassification to indefinite for dysplasia (IND, 9.2%) or low-grade dysplasia (LGD, 4.8%). For IND biopsies, p53-IHC shifted diagnoses toward NDBE (17.0%) or LGD (37.1%). CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: p53-IHC interpretation is reliable, reproducible and clinically meaningful in BE diagnostics when standardized criteria are applied. These findings support broader use of p53-IHC in routine practice and incorporation of assessment criteria into guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Histopathology
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/his.70193
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic impact and reproducibility of p53 immunohistochemistry in Barrett's oesophagus: results of the Dutch Esophageal Pathology Panel ( DEPP )

Lindsey Oudijk, Sybren L. Meijer, Lodewijk A.A. Brosens, Bert Timmer et al.
Histopathology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Diagnostic impact and reproducibility of p53 immunohistochemistry in Barrett's oesophagus: results of the Dutch Esophageal Pathology Panel ( DEPP )

Lindsey Oudijk, Sybren L. Meijer, Lodewijk A.A. Brosens, Bert Timmer, Gürsah Kats‐Ugurlu, Hans Halfwerk, Ineke van Lijnschoten, Myrtle van der Wel, Onno J. de Boer, J. van der Laan, Michail Doukas, Ariadne H.A.G. Ooms, Michel Botros, Rachel S. van der Post, Fiebo ten Kate, Sarah M. Issa, Ylva A. Weeda, Mihaela G. Raicu
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence supporting the use of p53 immunohistochemistry (p53-IHC) in Barrett's oesophagus (BE) is largely based on selected series, limiting generalizability. This study evaluates p53-IHC in a nationwide, real-world BE-cohort within a universal healthcare system, assessing concordance with referring hospitals, interobserver agreement (IOA) and its impact on routine diagnostic decisions. METHODS: Revision cases submitted to the Dutch Esophageal Pathology Panel (DEPP) were assessed by trained and experienced pathologists for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-based classification (Vienna classification), p53-IHC patterns (wild-type, overexpression, double clone, null mutation and equivocal) and combined H&E/p53-IHC review. Concordance between referring hospitals and the expert panel (Cohen's kappa) and IOA among panel pathologists (Fleiss' kappa) were assessed, along with the impact of p53-IHC on diagnostic reclassification. RESULTS: A total of 1,146 consecutive patient consultation cases (1,704 biopsy levels) were included, with a median of 12 DEPP pathologist assessments per biopsy. Overall concordance of p53 assessment between referring hospitals and the expert panel was moderate-to-substantial (κ = 0.61, 95% CI 0.58-0.64), with 24.2% of p53-IHC assessments reclassified. IOA among 13 pathologists assessing 316 endoscopic biopsies was substantial (κ = 0.65, 95% CI 0.61-0.69). Ancillary p53-IHC influenced pathologists' decisions across biopsy levels. For non-dysplastic (NDBE) biopsies, aberrant p53-IHC prompted reclassification to indefinite for dysplasia (IND, 9.2%) or low-grade dysplasia (LGD, 4.8%). For IND biopsies, p53-IHC shifted diagnoses toward NDBE (17.0%) or LGD (37.1%). CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: p53-IHC interpretation is reliable, reproducible and clinically meaningful in BE diagnostics when standardized criteria are applied. These findings support broader use of p53-IHC in routine practice and incorporation of assessment criteria into guidelines.

Histopathology
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Dutch Cancer Society (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL), Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL), PathoFinder (Netherlands) (NL), Haga Hospital (NL), Isala (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
KWF Kankerbestrijding, Maag Lever Darm Stichting
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.