Geoscience Visual Presentation G01: Geomechanical complexity and stress variability in the Cooper-Eromanga Basins: implications for geological carbon storage

Geoscience Visual Presentation G01 Central Australia’s Cooper-Eromanga Basins have strong potential to become a world-class hub for geological carbon storage. However, deep reservoir sequences with high stresses and pore pressures create major uncertainties for fault stability during carbon dioxide (CO2) injection. Understanding these geomechanical complexities is critical to de-risking carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, as unfavourable stress conditions may compromise caprock integrity, trigger-induced seismicity and ultimately lead to CO2 leakage. This study compiles an extensive set of in-situ stress data and integrates it with existing large-scale geomechanical-numerical models to evaluate the basin-scale stress state. The updated stress map for the Cooper-Eromanga Basins shows a dominant east–west orientation of the maximum horizontal stress but with local re-orientations of up to 35° near faults and lithological contrasts. Vertical stress gradients range from 15.5 to 23.8 MPa/km, while minimum and maximum horizontal stress gradients vary between 12.4 to 27.2 MPa/km and 21.9 to 50 MPa/km, respectively. 1D Mechanical Earth Models highlight the influence of lithological contrasts on stress magnitudes, while 3D geomechanical models reveal significant vertical and lateral variations in stress regimes. Basin-scale results suggest a dominant strike-slip stress regime, with significant variations towards normal faulting at different depth intervals mainly related to lithology changes, and variable differential stresses. This study highlights the need for predictive 3D stress modelling as a critical tool to improve understanding of geomechanical risks and to ensure the safe deployment of CCS in this region. To access the Visual Presentation click on 'Supplementary data' below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep26437
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geoscience Visual Presentation G01: Geomechanical complexity and stress variability in the Cooper-Eromanga Basins: implications for geological carbon storage

Parisa Tavoosiiraj
Australian Energy Producers journal.
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Geoscience Visual Presentation G01: Geomechanical complexity and stress variability in the Cooper-Eromanga Basins: implications for geological carbon storage

Parisa Tavoosiiraj
article en

Abstract

Geoscience Visual Presentation G01 Central Australia’s Cooper-Eromanga Basins have strong potential to become a world-class hub for geological carbon storage. However, deep reservoir sequences with high stresses and pore pressures create major uncertainties for fault stability during carbon dioxide (CO2) injection. Understanding these geomechanical complexities is critical to de-risking carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, as unfavourable stress conditions may compromise caprock integrity, trigger-induced seismicity and ultimately lead to CO2 leakage. This study compiles an extensive set of in-situ stress data and integrates it with existing large-scale geomechanical-numerical models to evaluate the basin-scale stress state. The updated stress map for the Cooper-Eromanga Basins shows a dominant east–west orientation of the maximum horizontal stress but with local re-orientations of up to 35° near faults and lithological contrasts. Vertical stress gradients range from 15.5 to 23.8 MPa/km, while minimum and maximum horizontal stress gradients vary between 12.4 to 27.2 MPa/km and 21.9 to 50 MPa/km, respectively. 1D Mechanical Earth Models highlight the influence of lithological contrasts on stress magnitudes, while 3D geomechanical models reveal significant vertical and lateral variations in stress regimes. Basin-scale results suggest a dominant strike-slip stress regime, with significant variations towards normal faulting at different depth intervals mainly related to lithology changes, and variable differential stresses. This study highlights the need for predictive 3D stress modelling as a critical tool to improve understanding of geomechanical risks and to ensure the safe deployment of CCS in this region. To access the Visual Presentation click on 'Supplementary data' below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 66(S2)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.