Fraying the Edges of Literacies: What Do Post‐Philosophies Produce for Early Childhood Literacies?

ABSTRACT As two scholars who have read and thought with post‐philosophies, such as posthumanism, we invite a discussion on how post‐philosophies have, and could, open up possibilities for thinking about early literacies. The paper traces the development and contribution of post‐perspectives in relation to early childhood literacies, before identifying three interconnected threads via which post‐philosophies invite us to conceptualize, teach, and research literacies: uncertainty, mundanity, and movement. Concepts such as these, we argue, have frayed the edges of “the box” that defines literacy via humanist logics, thus serving as gathering points for a growing critique of the assumption that “human” is a fixed and unproblematic category. Through personal reflections on how post‐philosophical concepts have forced us to think differently, we ask: what have, and could, post‐philosophies, specifically those that align with posthumanism, contribute to the field of early childhood literacies?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70132
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fraying the Edges of Literacies: What Do Post‐Philosophies Produce for Early Childhood Literacies?

Candace R. Kuby, Abigail Hackett
Reading Research Quarterly
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Fraying the Edges of Literacies: What Do Post‐Philosophies Produce for Early Childhood Literacies?

Candace R. Kuby, Abigail Hackett
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As two scholars who have read and thought with post‐philosophies, such as posthumanism, we invite a discussion on how post‐philosophies have, and could, open up possibilities for thinking about early literacies. The paper traces the development and contribution of post‐perspectives in relation to early childhood literacies, before identifying three interconnected threads via which post‐philosophies invite us to conceptualize, teach, and research literacies: uncertainty, mundanity, and movement. Concepts such as these, we argue, have frayed the edges of “the box” that defines literacy via humanist logics, thus serving as gathering points for a growing critique of the assumption that “human” is a fixed and unproblematic category. Through personal reflections on how post‐philosophical concepts have forced us to think differently, we ask: what have, and could, post‐philosophies, specifically those that align with posthumanism, contribute to the field of early childhood literacies?

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 61(3)
Sheffield Hallam University (GB), University of Missouri (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.