Orepass geotechnical rating evaluator adapted from existing orepass longevity calculator

This article presents an orepass geotechnical rating evaluator (OGRE) developed to help geotechnical and mine engineers assess the geotechnical risks of proposed orepass locations. Orepasses (near-vertical excavations that transport ore by gravity) are integral to many underground stope mining methods that rely on centralized haulage levels. Despite their importance, orepass designs are often not finalized during planning stages, and their longevity can be compromised by geotechnical conditions. The evaluation method presented is adapted from an existing orepass longevity calculator. Operational considerations, such as material size, blasting practices, cushion guidelines, and support or liner use, were removed, while new geotechnical parameters (sulfide-generating potential, orientation of finger raises, intersection angle of finger raises, and rock quality clarifications) were incorporated based on insights gathered from a survey on orepass planning, design, and construction practices in Canada and the United States. This allows the OGRE to consider stress regime, rock quality, geological structures, sulfide-generating potential, orepass orientation, and finger raise or knuckle use. The resulting tool enables comparison of orepass location options based on geotechnical risk. The value of each of the six aforementioned parameters individually ranges from as low as 0.05 up to 1.00, and they are multiplied together to produce a final rating between approximately 0 and 1. If an orepass location option has a number closer to 1.00, it would indicate less geotechnical risk. Furthermore, this article also identifies methods of managing geotechnical risk through design modifications for orepass locations identified as high risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25726668261437908
Primary Topic
Mining Techniques and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orepass geotechnical rating evaluator adapted from existing orepass longevity calculator

Andrea Brickey, R. Mitra, Kristin Guerin-Davey
Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy
Mining Techniques and Economics
article

Orepass geotechnical rating evaluator adapted from existing orepass longevity calculator

Andrea Brickey, R. Mitra, Kristin Guerin-Davey
article en

Abstract

This article presents an orepass geotechnical rating evaluator (OGRE) developed to help geotechnical and mine engineers assess the geotechnical risks of proposed orepass locations. Orepasses (near-vertical excavations that transport ore by gravity) are integral to many underground stope mining methods that rely on centralized haulage levels. Despite their importance, orepass designs are often not finalized during planning stages, and their longevity can be compromised by geotechnical conditions. The evaluation method presented is adapted from an existing orepass longevity calculator. Operational considerations, such as material size, blasting practices, cushion guidelines, and support or liner use, were removed, while new geotechnical parameters (sulfide-generating potential, orientation of finger raises, intersection angle of finger raises, and rock quality clarifications) were incorporated based on insights gathered from a survey on orepass planning, design, and construction practices in Canada and the United States. This allows the OGRE to consider stress regime, rock quality, geological structures, sulfide-generating potential, orepass orientation, and finger raise or knuckle use. The resulting tool enables comparison of orepass location options based on geotechnical risk. The value of each of the six aforementioned parameters individually ranges from as low as 0.05 up to 1.00, and they are multiplied together to produce a final rating between approximately 0 and 1. If an orepass location option has a number closer to 1.00, it would indicate less geotechnical risk. Furthermore, this article also identifies methods of managing geotechnical risk through design modifications for orepass locations identified as high risk.

Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mining Techniques and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.