On Northern, Southern, and entangled cosmopolitanism: English language ideologies among migrants in Australia

This article explores migrants’ English language ideologies, focusing on their views about preferred English varieties in intercultural communication in Australia, specifically, on their concerns about the use of (non)native or (non)standard English in different interactional settings. Drawing on the Southern theory, it re-explicates several concepts of cosmopolitanism in relation to English and suggests that people’s ideologies about language use in cosmopolitan contexts can align with three main forms of cosmopolitanism: Northern cosmopolitanism, Southern cosmopolitanism, and entangled cosmopolitanism. Interviews with migrants of different ethnic backgrounds are the main source of data. Findings suggest that the participants’ views on practicing different English varieties reflected their ideas about engaging with each of the three cosmopolitanism orientations. The participants’ varied positions in relation to English and cosmopolitanism were an example of language ideological assemblage. Their alignment with different forms of cosmopolitanism could be a manifestation of ideological tensions about traditional/modern Australia associated with different English-speaking styles. In addition, ideas of Northern, Southern, and entangled cosmopolitanism in relation to English should not be understood as binary or trinary terms, but as a way to depict the complexity of interactions among people in cosmopolitan contexts where any varieties and practices of English are made possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2026.2688094
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Northern, Southern, and entangled cosmopolitanism: English language ideologies among migrants in Australia

Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Sinfree Makoni
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

On Northern, Southern, and entangled cosmopolitanism: English language ideologies among migrants in Australia

Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Sinfree Makoni
article en

Abstract

This article explores migrants’ English language ideologies, focusing on their views about preferred English varieties in intercultural communication in Australia, specifically, on their concerns about the use of (non)native or (non)standard English in different interactional settings. Drawing on the Southern theory, it re-explicates several concepts of cosmopolitanism in relation to English and suggests that people’s ideologies about language use in cosmopolitan contexts can align with three main forms of cosmopolitanism: Northern cosmopolitanism, Southern cosmopolitanism, and entangled cosmopolitanism. Interviews with migrants of different ethnic backgrounds are the main source of data. Findings suggest that the participants’ views on practicing different English varieties reflected their ideas about engaging with each of the three cosmopolitanism orientations. The participants’ varied positions in relation to English and cosmopolitanism were an example of language ideological assemblage. Their alignment with different forms of cosmopolitanism could be a manifestation of ideological tensions about traditional/modern Australia associated with different English-speaking styles. In addition, ideas of Northern, Southern, and entangled cosmopolitanism in relation to English should not be understood as binary or trinary terms, but as a way to depict the complexity of interactions among people in cosmopolitan contexts where any varieties and practices of English are made possible.

Critical Inquiry in Language Studies
Pennsylvania State University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.