An integrated framework for climate risk management and reporting in contemporary business reality

Purpose This paper develops an integrated framework for climate risk management, positioning accounting and reporting systems not merely as accountability mechanisms but as key drivers of change in internal risk management processes. This study aims to clarify how firms translate climate-related regulatory requirements and carbon neutrality commitments into substantive governance, risk management and reporting practices. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a conceptual and integrative approach, drawing on enterprise risk management (ERM) principles (particularly ISO 31000), accounting and reporting frameworks (e.g. European Sustainability Reporting Standards, TCFD) and prior literature on climate disclosure, governance and management. It synthesises regulatory developments within the EU sustainable finance framework and connects them with ISO 31000 to develop an analytical framework for managing and reporting climate risk. Findings The analysis identifies five interrelated challenges that constrain the effectiveness of climate risk management. Risk governance remains underdeveloped, requiring stronger board oversight and organisational capacity. Risk assessment is limited by data constraints, scenario ambiguity and difficulties in capturing the systemic and long-term nature of climate risks. Risk treatment is characterised by increasing complexity in designing adaptation strategies and addressing emerging financial risk exposures, including insurance gaps and risk-financing requirements. Reporting practices continue to face credibility concerns, while the absence of standardised metrics and integrated assurance processes undermines the reliability and comparability of disclosed information. Originality/value By linking accounting and reporting systems to ERM, the study provides a structured framework for understanding how regulatory pressures translate into organisational change and support the integrated management of contemporary risk challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meditari Accountancy Research
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-04-2026-3901
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integrated framework for climate risk management and reporting in contemporary business reality

Monika Wieczorek‐Kosmala, Marco Papa, Fábio Lotti Oliva, Anna Losa et al.
Meditari Accountancy Research
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

An integrated framework for climate risk management and reporting in contemporary business reality

Monika Wieczorek‐Kosmala, Marco Papa, Fábio Lotti Oliva, Anna Losa, Philip Linsley, Donald Pagach
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper develops an integrated framework for climate risk management, positioning accounting and reporting systems not merely as accountability mechanisms but as key drivers of change in internal risk management processes. This study aims to clarify how firms translate climate-related regulatory requirements and carbon neutrality commitments into substantive governance, risk management and reporting practices. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a conceptual and integrative approach, drawing on enterprise risk management (ERM) principles (particularly ISO 31000), accounting and reporting frameworks (e.g. European Sustainability Reporting Standards, TCFD) and prior literature on climate disclosure, governance and management. It synthesises regulatory developments within the EU sustainable finance framework and connects them with ISO 31000 to develop an analytical framework for managing and reporting climate risk. Findings The analysis identifies five interrelated challenges that constrain the effectiveness of climate risk management. Risk governance remains underdeveloped, requiring stronger board oversight and organisational capacity. Risk assessment is limited by data constraints, scenario ambiguity and difficulties in capturing the systemic and long-term nature of climate risks. Risk treatment is characterised by increasing complexity in designing adaptation strategies and addressing emerging financial risk exposures, including insurance gaps and risk-financing requirements. Reporting practices continue to face credibility concerns, while the absence of standardised metrics and integrated assurance processes undermines the reliability and comparability of disclosed information. Originality/value By linking accounting and reporting systems to ERM, the study provides a structured framework for understanding how regulatory pressures translate into organisational change and support the integrated management of contemporary risk challenges.

Meditari Accountancy Research
North Carolina State University (US), University of Economics in Katowice (PL), York University (CA), Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (BR), University of York (GB), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.