Effects of lower limb joint manipulation on squat strength and ankle range of motion: a sham-controlled double-blind randomised cross-over trial

BACKGROUND: The back squat is a commonly prescribed exercise for developing lower body strength. The ability to squat can be affected by reduced ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF-ROM), leading to limited squat depth and dysfunctional compensatory movement patterns. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of high-velocity low-amplitude lower limb manipulations on 1 repetition maximum (1RM) back squat strength, sagittal plane ankle kinematics during a squat, and active DF-ROM in individuals with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM. METHODS: Twenty-six enrolled; Twenty-four analysed resistance-trained participants with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM participated in this double-blind randomised sham-controlled cross-over trial. Interventions involved high-velocity low-amplitude joint manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM, and a sham which mimicked the manipulations using a mechanical drop mechanism. The primary outcome was a change in back squat 1RM between baseline to post-intervention, with secondary outcomes being maximal ankle DF-ROM during the 1RM squat using 3D motion capture, and change in DF-ROM during the weightbearing lunge test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between interventions for back squat 1RM (p = 0.27). From baseline, the 1RM increased by 4.75 kg (3.6%) following manipulation and 2.75 kg (2.1%) following the sham. There were no statistically significant differences between interventions on maximal DF-ROM during the back squat (p = 0.24) and no statistically significant differences in ankle DF-ROM immediately following either intervention (p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Based on these results a single session of high-velocity low-amplitude manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM does not significantly improve 1RM back squat strength compared to sham, and does not influence short-term ankle DF-ROM. Trial registration The study was pre-registered with ANZCTR (ACTRN12622000811707).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-026-00659-7
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of lower limb joint manipulation on squat strength and ankle range of motion: a sham-controlled double-blind randomised cross-over trial

Sasha L. Aspinall, Alasdair R. Dempsey, G. Gregory Haff, Barrett Losco et al.
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Effects of lower limb joint manipulation on squat strength and ankle range of motion: a sham-controlled double-blind randomised cross-over trial

Sasha L. Aspinall, Alasdair R. Dempsey, G. Gregory Haff, Barrett Losco, Reneigh Morley-Hart
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The back squat is a commonly prescribed exercise for developing lower body strength. The ability to squat can be affected by reduced ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF-ROM), leading to limited squat depth and dysfunctional compensatory movement patterns. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of high-velocity low-amplitude lower limb manipulations on 1 repetition maximum (1RM) back squat strength, sagittal plane ankle kinematics during a squat, and active DF-ROM in individuals with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM. METHODS: Twenty-six enrolled; Twenty-four analysed resistance-trained participants with asymptomatic deficits in DF-ROM participated in this double-blind randomised sham-controlled cross-over trial. Interventions involved high-velocity low-amplitude joint manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM, and a sham which mimicked the manipulations using a mechanical drop mechanism. The primary outcome was a change in back squat 1RM between baseline to post-intervention, with secondary outcomes being maximal ankle DF-ROM during the 1RM squat using 3D motion capture, and change in DF-ROM during the weightbearing lunge test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between interventions for back squat 1RM (p = 0.27). From baseline, the 1RM increased by 4.75 kg (3.6%) following manipulation and 2.75 kg (2.1%) following the sham. There were no statistically significant differences between interventions on maximal DF-ROM during the back squat (p = 0.24) and no statistically significant differences in ankle DF-ROM immediately following either intervention (p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Based on these results a single session of high-velocity low-amplitude manipulations targeting ankle DF-ROM does not significantly improve 1RM back squat strength compared to sham, and does not influence short-term ankle DF-ROM. Trial registration The study was pre-registered with ANZCTR (ACTRN12622000811707).

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Edith Cowan University (AU), Murdoch University (AU), University of Salford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.