Implementing a patient-oriented pole walking intervention in retirement homes: A non-randomized feasibility trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a patient-oriented pole walking (PW) intervention in retirement home settings and preliminary changes in outcome measures related to physical function and other fall- and fracture-related risk factors to inform a future randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: This single-arm, non-randomized feasibility trial implemented a patient-oriented PW intervention across four retirement homes in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. During Summer 2022, we assessed 24 residents for eligibility, of which 19 consented and 17 received the intervention. The intervention was offered as supervised group sessions (20-60 minutes) three times per week for 12 weeks. Each session consisted of posture and balance warm-up, PW, muscle strengthening, and stretching. The primary outcome measure was feasibility as assessed by consent, recruitment, retention, and adherence rates as well as by intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility scores. The secondary outcome measures included safety (evaluated by recorded adverse events) and preliminary 12-week changes in physical function and other fall- and fracture-related risk factors (examined with paired-samples t-tests or repeated measures analysis of covariance models). RESULTS: Fifteen participants (mean age 85.2 years; 93% female) completed the study. The consent, recruitment, retention, and mean adherence rates were 79%, 2.7 participants/site/month, 88%, and 90%, respectively. The mean participant- and instructor-reported scores for intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were all > 4.0 (out of 5). There were no recorded intervention-related serious adverse events. Participants improved their functional balance/mobility (timed "up & go" test: -1.6 seconds; 95% CI: -2.7 to -0.4), lower-body strength (30-second chair stand test: 2.4 repetitions; 1.2 to 3.5), 36-item short-form survey physical functioning score (12.9; 3.7 to 22.2), and forearm muscle area (67.7 mm2; 12.9 to 122.6) over 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible and safe to implement our patient-oriented PW intervention in retirement homes. Findings will inform our future RCT in these settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05388227.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349290
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing a patient-oriented pole walking intervention in retirement homes: A non-randomized feasibility trial

Mohsen Keramati, Saija Kontulainen, Mahdi Rostami Haji Abadi
PLoS ONE
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Implementing a patient-oriented pole walking intervention in retirement homes: A non-randomized feasibility trial

Mohsen Keramati, Saija Kontulainen, Mahdi Rostami Haji Abadi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a patient-oriented pole walking (PW) intervention in retirement home settings and preliminary changes in outcome measures related to physical function and other fall- and fracture-related risk factors to inform a future randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: This single-arm, non-randomized feasibility trial implemented a patient-oriented PW intervention across four retirement homes in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. During Summer 2022, we assessed 24 residents for eligibility, of which 19 consented and 17 received the intervention. The intervention was offered as supervised group sessions (20-60 minutes) three times per week for 12 weeks. Each session consisted of posture and balance warm-up, PW, muscle strengthening, and stretching. The primary outcome measure was feasibility as assessed by consent, recruitment, retention, and adherence rates as well as by intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility scores. The secondary outcome measures included safety (evaluated by recorded adverse events) and preliminary 12-week changes in physical function and other fall- and fracture-related risk factors (examined with paired-samples t-tests or repeated measures analysis of covariance models). RESULTS: Fifteen participants (mean age 85.2 years; 93% female) completed the study. The consent, recruitment, retention, and mean adherence rates were 79%, 2.7 participants/site/month, 88%, and 90%, respectively. The mean participant- and instructor-reported scores for intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were all > 4.0 (out of 5). There were no recorded intervention-related serious adverse events. Participants improved their functional balance/mobility (timed "up & go" test: -1.6 seconds; 95% CI: -2.7 to -0.4), lower-body strength (30-second chair stand test: 2.4 repetitions; 1.2 to 3.5), 36-item short-form survey physical functioning score (12.9; 3.7 to 22.2), and forearm muscle area (67.7 mm2; 12.9 to 122.6) over 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible and safe to implement our patient-oriented PW intervention in retirement homes. Findings will inform our future RCT in these settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05388227.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.