Unveiling Shortfalls in Biodiversity Knowledge of Brazilian Butterflies

Three biodiversity knowledge gaps, known as the Linnaean, Wallacean, and Darwinian shortfalls, limit our ability to model biodiversity, assess extinction risk, and understand evolutionary patterns. These shortfalls are particularly severe for insects, which remain comparatively overlooked in science and conservation relative to plants and vertebrates. Here, we investigated the patterns of these knowledge gaps for 3567 Brazilian butterfly species. Our models suggest that Brazilian butterfly diversity may reach approximately 4200 species, indicating that more than 600 species likely remain undescribed and that, at current description rates, documenting this diversity could take several decades. Spatial analyses showed high bias in occurrence records, with large portions of the country lacking occurrence records and most sampled communities with low sampling completeness. Model predictions revealed high estimated richness in the south-eastern Atlantic Forest, western Amazon Rainforest, and parts of the Cerrado. In addition, more than half of all species lack publicly available genetic data, potentially limiting their inclusion in phylogenetic studies. Our results reveal that substantial knowledge gaps persist even for one of the most intensively studied insect groups and highlight key priorities for future taxonomic, sampling, and molecular efforts aimed at improving our understanding and conservation of Brazilian butterfly diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/d18060373
Primary Topic
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling Shortfalls in Biodiversity Knowledge of Brazilian Butterflies

André Victor Lucci Freitas, Jhonny J. M. Guedes, Jessie Pereira dos Santos
Diversity
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
article

Unveiling Shortfalls in Biodiversity Knowledge of Brazilian Butterflies

André Victor Lucci Freitas, Jhonny J. M. Guedes, Jessie Pereira dos Santos
article en

Abstract

Three biodiversity knowledge gaps, known as the Linnaean, Wallacean, and Darwinian shortfalls, limit our ability to model biodiversity, assess extinction risk, and understand evolutionary patterns. These shortfalls are particularly severe for insects, which remain comparatively overlooked in science and conservation relative to plants and vertebrates. Here, we investigated the patterns of these knowledge gaps for 3567 Brazilian butterfly species. Our models suggest that Brazilian butterfly diversity may reach approximately 4200 species, indicating that more than 600 species likely remain undescribed and that, at current description rates, documenting this diversity could take several decades. Spatial analyses showed high bias in occurrence records, with large portions of the country lacking occurrence records and most sampled communities with low sampling completeness. Model predictions revealed high estimated richness in the south-eastern Atlantic Forest, western Amazon Rainforest, and parts of the Cerrado. In addition, more than half of all species lack publicly available genetic data, potentially limiting their inclusion in phylogenetic studies. Our results reveal that substantial knowledge gaps persist even for one of the most intensively studied insect groups and highlight key priorities for future taxonomic, sampling, and molecular efforts aimed at improving our understanding and conservation of Brazilian butterfly diversity.

DiversityVol. 18(6)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.