Impact of Breast Augmentation, Reduction, and Nipple Repair on Breastfeeding Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract Plastic surgery on the breast is among the most common aesthetic and reconstructive procedures performed today, with a variety of surgical approaches available. Emerging evidence suggests that these procedures may negatively affect breastfeeding. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of breast augmentation, reduction, and nipple repair operations on breastfeeding success. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). Prospective and retrospective studies were included with the endpoint of quantitative breastfeeding success rates. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we calculated pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared subgroups where p<0.05 corresponded with a significant difference. 57 studies with 381,199 patients were used for the meta-analysis. No single technique for breast augmentation was associated with a significant difference in overall breastfeeding success (73.4% vs 86%, p=0.405). In contrast, comparing breast reduction techniques showed that some yielded significantly reduced breastfeeding success (p=0.021), particularly with classic reduction mastopexy surgical approach using horizontal (Prop=14.4%, CI 0–96%) and vertical (Prop=26.2%, CI 2–88%) pedicles. Other reduction approaches, including central (Prop=100%, CI 0–100%), superior-lateral (Prop=88%, CI 70–98%), superomedial (Prop=100%, CI 81–100%), and central-superior-lateral (Prop=100%, CI 86–100%) pedicles, showed promising breastfeeding outcomes. Nipple correction methods did not substantially reduce breastfeeding success (Prop=84%, CI 76–89%). Based on our results, nipple repair methods or breast augmentation do not appear to adversely impact breastfeeding outcomes, while breast reduction procedures are associated with a significant reduction in success, with variations depending on the surgical technique employed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag117
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Breast Augmentation, Reduction, and Nipple Repair on Breastfeeding Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nándor Ács, Levente Sára, Szabolcs Várbíró, Mikolt Bakony et al.
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Impact of Breast Augmentation, Reduction, and Nipple Repair on Breastfeeding Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nándor Ács, Levente Sára, Szabolcs Várbíró, Mikolt Bakony, Tamás Varga, Péter Hegyi, Péter Pál, András Mihály Géczi, Loretta Nyirady, S Váncsa, B Teutsch
article en

Abstract

Abstract Plastic surgery on the breast is among the most common aesthetic and reconstructive procedures performed today, with a variety of surgical approaches available. Emerging evidence suggests that these procedures may negatively affect breastfeeding. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of breast augmentation, reduction, and nipple repair operations on breastfeeding success. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). Prospective and retrospective studies were included with the endpoint of quantitative breastfeeding success rates. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we calculated pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared subgroups where p<0.05 corresponded with a significant difference. 57 studies with 381,199 patients were used for the meta-analysis. No single technique for breast augmentation was associated with a significant difference in overall breastfeeding success (73.4% vs 86%, p=0.405). In contrast, comparing breast reduction techniques showed that some yielded significantly reduced breastfeeding success (p=0.021), particularly with classic reduction mastopexy surgical approach using horizontal (Prop=14.4%, CI 0–96%) and vertical (Prop=26.2%, CI 2–88%) pedicles. Other reduction approaches, including central (Prop=100%, CI 0–100%), superior-lateral (Prop=88%, CI 70–98%), superomedial (Prop=100%, CI 81–100%), and central-superior-lateral (Prop=100%, CI 86–100%) pedicles, showed promising breastfeeding outcomes. Nipple correction methods did not substantially reduce breastfeeding success (Prop=84%, CI 76–89%). Based on our results, nipple repair methods or breast augmentation do not appear to adversely impact breastfeeding outcomes, while breast reduction procedures are associated with a significant reduction in success, with variations depending on the surgical technique employed.

Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Semmelweis University (HU), Institute of Clinical Research (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.