Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia

ISSUE ADDRESSED: For people in rural and remote areas, government-funded travel subsidy schemes provide vital financial assistance and equitable access to specialist healthcare in city centres. However, few studies have examined users' experiences of these schemes. METHODS: Adults travelling for healthcare in Queensland, Australia, completed an online survey capturing their most recent experience applying for the Patient Travel Subsidy Scheme (PTSS). Participants' responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: From 69 respondents (aged 29-80 years, 60% female, 88% most recent application for cancer-related care), 57% agreed information about the scheme was easy to access, although only 39% found the initial registration process easy. Most indicated that local hospital staff and PTSS officers were knowledgeable and helpful (65%-70%). Less agreed that staff were available to assist (48%) or that processes were well-coordinated across hospitals (42%). Of those who sought reimbursement for travel costs (75%), almost two-thirds (63%) were out-of-pocket post-reimbursement (mean = AU$725; range = AU$20-10 000). Delayed reimbursement was relatively common (60%) and contributed to financial hardship (36%). For some (13%), challenges accessing the scheme impacted treatment decisions. User feedback included improved visibility of online application and reimbursement status, and fast-tracking of high-risk, urgent and ongoing cases. CONCLUSIONS: While information about the scheme and interactions with frontline staff were viewed positively by most, several system-level challenges remain. SO WHAT?: Substantial out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement delays contribute to financial hardship and can affect treatment decisions. Increased subsidy reflecting actual travel costs, timely reimbursement, fast-tracking, and greater application assistance and coordination would improve user experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.70207
Primary Topic
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia

Elizabeth A. Johnston, Leah Zajdlewicz, Fiona M. Crawford-Williams, Belinda C. Goodwin et al.
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
article

Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia

Elizabeth A. Johnston, Leah Zajdlewicz, Fiona M. Crawford-Williams, Belinda C. Goodwin, Emma Charlotte Pearse
article en

Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED: For people in rural and remote areas, government-funded travel subsidy schemes provide vital financial assistance and equitable access to specialist healthcare in city centres. However, few studies have examined users' experiences of these schemes. METHODS: Adults travelling for healthcare in Queensland, Australia, completed an online survey capturing their most recent experience applying for the Patient Travel Subsidy Scheme (PTSS). Participants' responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: From 69 respondents (aged 29-80 years, 60% female, 88% most recent application for cancer-related care), 57% agreed information about the scheme was easy to access, although only 39% found the initial registration process easy. Most indicated that local hospital staff and PTSS officers were knowledgeable and helpful (65%-70%). Less agreed that staff were available to assist (48%) or that processes were well-coordinated across hospitals (42%). Of those who sought reimbursement for travel costs (75%), almost two-thirds (63%) were out-of-pocket post-reimbursement (mean = AU$725; range = AU$20-10 000). Delayed reimbursement was relatively common (60%) and contributed to financial hardship (36%). For some (13%), challenges accessing the scheme impacted treatment decisions. User feedback included improved visibility of online application and reimbursement status, and fast-tracking of high-risk, urgent and ongoing cases. CONCLUSIONS: While information about the scheme and interactions with frontline staff were viewed positively by most, several system-level challenges remain. SO WHAT?: Substantial out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement delays contribute to financial hardship and can affect treatment decisions. Increased subsidy reflecting actual travel costs, timely reimbursement, fast-tracking, and greater application assistance and coordination would improve user experiences.

Health Promotion Journal of AustraliaVol. 37(3)
Deakin University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Cancer Council Queensland (AU), Macular Disease Foundation Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.