How voters choose under the Borda rule: evidence from a post-election survey experiment in Germany 2025

Abstract The Borda count offers a promising alternative to counteract the growing polarization of party systems by incentivizing moderate party strategies. However, empirical evidence on the Borda count is still lacking. This paper presents results from an online survey conducted in the aftermath of the 2025 German federal election, in which respondents were asked for their vote choice under a Borda count system. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: in the first, they could rank up to three out of seven parties; in the second, they could rank all seven parties. The findings show that more ranks considered, the more fragmented the election result. It also shows that the Borda count has mixed effects on policy congruence between voters and parliament. Respondents’ overall acceptance of the Borda rule was moderate to negative, with many of the objections cited were based on misconceptions about the system’s consequences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Public Choice
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-026-01424-3
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How voters choose under the Borda rule: evidence from a post-election survey experiment in Germany 2025

Anna‐Sophie Kurella
Public Choice
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

How voters choose under the Borda rule: evidence from a post-election survey experiment in Germany 2025

Anna‐Sophie Kurella
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Borda count offers a promising alternative to counteract the growing polarization of party systems by incentivizing moderate party strategies. However, empirical evidence on the Borda count is still lacking. This paper presents results from an online survey conducted in the aftermath of the 2025 German federal election, in which respondents were asked for their vote choice under a Borda count system. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: in the first, they could rank up to three out of seven parties; in the second, they could rank all seven parties. The findings show that more ranks considered, the more fragmented the election result. It also shows that the Borda count has mixed effects on policy congruence between voters and parliament. Respondents’ overall acceptance of the Borda rule was moderate to negative, with many of the objections cited were based on misconceptions about the system’s consequences.

Public Choice
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.