Football’s Climate Own Goal: The Case for Abolishing the FIFA World Cup

This paper criticizes the environmental devastation and pervasive greenwashing associated with corporate football, with a particular focus on the FIFA men’s World Cup Finals. Analysis of past World Cups—Germany (2006), South Africa (2010), Brazil (2014), and particularly Qatar (2022)—reveals a consistent failure by FIFA and host nations to meet climate goals. Furthermore, major teams and governing bodies like UEFA and FIFA depend on sponsors from environmentally-damaging industries that utilize these sports for green cover, deflecting attention from their nefarious activities. As future World Cups expand (2026, 2030, 2034) and move to climate-vulnerable nations, the environmental impact is projected to worsen. We conclude that the corporate logic that has appropriated football makes positive change impossible, arguing that the only meaningful response to the World Cup’s systemic environmental impact, corruption, and social harm is its abolition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fast Capitalism
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32855/1930-014x.1516
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Football’s Climate Own Goal: The Case for Abolishing the FIFA World Cup

Joan Pedro-Carañana, Toby Miller
Fast Capitalism
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Football’s Climate Own Goal: The Case for Abolishing the FIFA World Cup

Joan Pedro-Carañana, Toby Miller
article en

Abstract

This paper criticizes the environmental devastation and pervasive greenwashing associated with corporate football, with a particular focus on the FIFA men’s World Cup Finals. Analysis of past World Cups—Germany (2006), South Africa (2010), Brazil (2014), and particularly Qatar (2022)—reveals a consistent failure by FIFA and host nations to meet climate goals. Furthermore, major teams and governing bodies like UEFA and FIFA depend on sponsors from environmentally-damaging industries that utilize these sports for green cover, deflecting attention from their nefarious activities. As future World Cups expand (2026, 2030, 2034) and move to climate-vulnerable nations, the environmental impact is projected to worsen. We conclude that the corporate logic that has appropriated football makes positive change impossible, arguing that the only meaningful response to the World Cup’s systemic environmental impact, corruption, and social harm is its abolition.

Fast CapitalismVol. 23(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.