Consumption-Evoked Emotions from Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives and Their Influence on Meat Reduction

Growing concerns about health and sustainability have increased interest in meat consumption and reduction. Emotions evoked during the consumption of meat and plant-based alternatives can significantly shape choices. This review examines theoretical and empirical evidence on emotions experienced during the consumption of meat and plant-based alternatives. Drawing on practice theory and the theory of constructed emotion, it proposes a mechanism through which emotions evoked during consumption influence subsequent decisions to consume or reduce meat. This narrative review first defines emotions and examines their role in meat consumption and reduction and then evaluates studies on emotions elicited by tasting meat and plant-based alternatives. The findings suggest that discussions around meat consumption evoke emotions of both positive and negative valence, which may create cognitive dissonance. However, during actual meat consumption, emotions of positive valence are most commonly reported. In contrast, plant-based alternatives tend to elicit emotions of negative valence, particularly when their sensory characteristics differ substantially from those of meat. This review hypothesises that emotions experienced during meat consumption generate prediction errors that update the brain’s internal model, thereby reinforcing or adjusting subsequent attitudes and choices. This mechanism is conceptualised as the Consumption-Emotion-Update (CEU) framework. Understanding how consumption-evoked emotions shape food choice behaviour may inform strategies aimed at promoting healthier and more sustainable diets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122179
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumption-Evoked Emotions from Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives and Their Influence on Meat Reduction

Niamh Harbourne, Declan J. Bolton, Stergios Melios, Emily Crofton
Foods
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Consumption-Evoked Emotions from Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives and Their Influence on Meat Reduction

Niamh Harbourne, Declan J. Bolton, Stergios Melios, Emily Crofton
article en

Abstract

Growing concerns about health and sustainability have increased interest in meat consumption and reduction. Emotions evoked during the consumption of meat and plant-based alternatives can significantly shape choices. This review examines theoretical and empirical evidence on emotions experienced during the consumption of meat and plant-based alternatives. Drawing on practice theory and the theory of constructed emotion, it proposes a mechanism through which emotions evoked during consumption influence subsequent decisions to consume or reduce meat. This narrative review first defines emotions and examines their role in meat consumption and reduction and then evaluates studies on emotions elicited by tasting meat and plant-based alternatives. The findings suggest that discussions around meat consumption evoke emotions of both positive and negative valence, which may create cognitive dissonance. However, during actual meat consumption, emotions of positive valence are most commonly reported. In contrast, plant-based alternatives tend to elicit emotions of negative valence, particularly when their sensory characteristics differ substantially from those of meat. This review hypothesises that emotions experienced during meat consumption generate prediction errors that update the brain’s internal model, thereby reinforcing or adjusting subsequent attitudes and choices. This mechanism is conceptualised as the Consumption-Emotion-Update (CEU) framework. Understanding how consumption-evoked emotions shape food choice behaviour may inform strategies aimed at promoting healthier and more sustainable diets.

FoodsVol. 15(12)
University College Dublin (IE), Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.