When does supply chain transparency pay? Traceability, due diligence and the moderating role of operational efficiency on financial performance in the fashion industry

Purpose This study examines when and how supply chain traceability and due diligence practices enhance financial performance, measured as asset turnover (ATO), in the fashion industry. Drawing on legitimacy theory and organizational slack, we argue that the financial returns from these practices are contingent on firms' operational efficiency, specifically, inventory efficiency and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) efficiency, rather than universal or unconditional. Design/methodology/approach We combine archival data from the fashion revolution foundation's annual fashion transparency index with financial data from Compustat for a sample of 40 publicly traded fashion companies. Moderated regression analysis tests whether inventory efficiency and SG&A efficiency condition the traceability-ATO and due diligence–ATO relationships. Findings The direct effects of traceability and due diligence on ATO are not statistically significant when examined in isolation. However, traceability positively influences ATO when moderated by high inventory efficiency and high SG&A efficiency. Contrary to the moderating pattern for traceability, due diligence shows negative interaction effects under conditions of high operational efficiency, suggesting important theoretical and practical distinctions between these two types of transparency practice. Originality/value This article offers the first empirical evidence linking supply chain traceability and due diligence to financial performance in the fashion industry, introducing operational efficiency as a boundary condition that explains when, and for whom, these practices yield measurable returns. The asymmetric moderation patterns for traceability versus due diligence challenge prevailing assumptions that transparency is uniformly beneficial, and contribute to legitimacy theory by specifying the resource conditions under which CSP investments translate into financial gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-01-2026-0003
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When does supply chain transparency pay? Traceability, due diligence and the moderating role of operational efficiency on financial performance in the fashion industry

Pankaj C. Patel, Divesh Ojha, Javad Sadeghi
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

When does supply chain transparency pay? Traceability, due diligence and the moderating role of operational efficiency on financial performance in the fashion industry

Pankaj C. Patel, Divesh Ojha, Javad Sadeghi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines when and how supply chain traceability and due diligence practices enhance financial performance, measured as asset turnover (ATO), in the fashion industry. Drawing on legitimacy theory and organizational slack, we argue that the financial returns from these practices are contingent on firms' operational efficiency, specifically, inventory efficiency and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) efficiency, rather than universal or unconditional. Design/methodology/approach We combine archival data from the fashion revolution foundation's annual fashion transparency index with financial data from Compustat for a sample of 40 publicly traded fashion companies. Moderated regression analysis tests whether inventory efficiency and SG&A efficiency condition the traceability-ATO and due diligence–ATO relationships. Findings The direct effects of traceability and due diligence on ATO are not statistically significant when examined in isolation. However, traceability positively influences ATO when moderated by high inventory efficiency and high SG&A efficiency. Contrary to the moderating pattern for traceability, due diligence shows negative interaction effects under conditions of high operational efficiency, suggesting important theoretical and practical distinctions between these two types of transparency practice. Originality/value This article offers the first empirical evidence linking supply chain traceability and due diligence to financial performance in the fashion industry, introducing operational efficiency as a boundary condition that explains when, and for whom, these practices yield measurable returns. The asymmetric moderation patterns for traceability versus due diligence challenge prevailing assumptions that transparency is uniformly beneficial, and contribute to legitimacy theory by specifying the resource conditions under which CSP investments translate into financial gains.

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US), Villanova University (US), Bryan College (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.