Correction: Basic emotions reported by individuals with persistent physical symptoms receiving exposure therapy versus healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care

The original version of this Article contained an error. In the Results section under the subheading ‘Test–retest reliability and construct validity of emotions questionnaire’, the incorrect test–retest reliability estimates for the emotion surprise were published and therefore do not match the correct estimates published in Table DS1 in the Supplementary Information file which accompanies the article. In addition, the estimates for shame were inadvertently omitted from the reported ranges summarizing the lowest and highest test–retest reliability estimates across the remaining emotions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-57897-1
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction: Basic emotions reported by individuals with persistent physical symptoms receiving exposure therapy versus healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care

Eva Toth-Pal, Majken Epstein, Michael Witthöft, Daniel Björkander et al.
Scientific Reports
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

Correction: Basic emotions reported by individuals with persistent physical symptoms receiving exposure therapy versus healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care

Eva Toth-Pal, Majken Epstein, Michael Witthöft, Daniel Björkander, Erland Axelsson, Amanda Kosic, John Wallert, Sigrid Salomonsson, Steven Nordin, Jonna Hybelius, Edward Spansk, Anna Olsson, L. De Winter, Alice Ahnlund Hoffmann, Gabriel Chahin, Tomas Åkerlund, Emma Strand, Caroline Wachtler, Sandra af Winklerfelt Hammarberg
article en

Abstract

The original version of this Article contained an error. In the Results section under the subheading ‘Test–retest reliability and construct validity of emotions questionnaire’, the incorrect test–retest reliability estimates for the emotion surprise were published and therefore do not match the correct estimates published in Table DS1 in the Supplementary Information file which accompanies the article. In addition, the estimates for shame were inadvertently omitted from the reported ranges summarizing the lowest and highest test–retest reliability estimates across the remaining emotions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Örebro University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Primary Health Care (QA), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE), Umeå University (SE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.