The emergence of ‘radicalisation’ within terrorism studies: a bibliometric analysis

“Radicalisation” has become one of the central organising principles of both contemporary research on terrorism and counterterrorism policy. While existing reconstructions of its emergence largely focused on the role of political institutions – particularly the European Union – such accounts provide only a partial explanation, leaving the internal dynamics of terrorism studies largely unexamined. Drawing on Google Scholar data, this article aims at supplementing the existing literature by providing a bibliometric analysis of terrorism studies publications (2000–2020) to reconstruct the emergence of “radicalisation” within the field. The findings on when “radicalisation” first emerged, the composition of the field-specific debate, and the publications that played a crucial role in the emergence of this notion, offer several insights for future research to investigate the simultaneously political and scientific conditions that facilitated the rise of “radicalisation.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Studies on Terrorism
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2026.2686518
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The emergence of ‘radicalisation’ within terrorism studies: a bibliometric analysis

Stefano Pirisi
Critical Studies on Terrorism
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

The emergence of ‘radicalisation’ within terrorism studies: a bibliometric analysis

Stefano Pirisi
article en

Abstract

“Radicalisation” has become one of the central organising principles of both contemporary research on terrorism and counterterrorism policy. While existing reconstructions of its emergence largely focused on the role of political institutions – particularly the European Union – such accounts provide only a partial explanation, leaving the internal dynamics of terrorism studies largely unexamined. Drawing on Google Scholar data, this article aims at supplementing the existing literature by providing a bibliometric analysis of terrorism studies publications (2000–2020) to reconstruct the emergence of “radicalisation” within the field. The findings on when “radicalisation” first emerged, the composition of the field-specific debate, and the publications that played a crucial role in the emergence of this notion, offer several insights for future research to investigate the simultaneously political and scientific conditions that facilitated the rise of “radicalisation.”

Critical Studies on Terrorism
University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.