Developing a summative and integrated framework to assess living lab interventions: Insights and reflections from a multi-site case study

The impact assessment of a Living Lab represents a crucial research challenge given the complexity and diversity of stakeholders and characteristics of Living Labs (e.g., context, scales, and goals). While the literature emphasizes formative approaches focused on performance using qualitative methods, summative assessments with quantitative methods remain underdeveloped, despite their importance in evaluating the final outcomes and demonstrating the effectiveness and accountability of Living Lab interventions. So far, there is limited documented experience and guidance on precise processes, tools, and methods on how to construct a summative and integrated impact assessment of Living Labs that is scientifically robust and operational., This study addresses this gap by demonstrating and detailing a novel and process-oriented framework for developing a summative and integrated impact assessment that is comprehensive, operational, and contextually and broadly useful in comparing the impacts of interventions within a Living Lab and across Living Labs. To achieve this, we draw on a case study of a Living Lab project in Switzerland that integrates multiple existing urban Living Labs. We demonstrate a four-stage process for developing a summative and integrated impact assessment, including a co-design approach as a fundamental component throughout. The process consists of (i) co-specifying the constructs of a summative and integrated impact assessment; (ii) co-creating an intervention-specific Theory of Change (ToC); (iii) translating the ToC into a logical framework with inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impacts; and (iv) defining measurable indicators corresponding to the identified constructs. Finally, we report challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations regarding the experience of co-developing a summative impact assessment. These can support other programs in their impact assessment endeavours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/98636
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a summative and integrated framework to assess living lab interventions: Insights and reflections from a multi-site case study

Jan Rosset, Selin Yılmaz, Nina Boogen, Manuel Grieder et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Developing a summative and integrated framework to assess living lab interventions: Insights and reflections from a multi-site case study

Jan Rosset, Selin Yılmaz, Nina Boogen, Manuel Grieder, Roger Bär, Stephanie Moser, Benjamin Schmid
article en

Abstract

The impact assessment of a Living Lab represents a crucial research challenge given the complexity and diversity of stakeholders and characteristics of Living Labs (e.g., context, scales, and goals). While the literature emphasizes formative approaches focused on performance using qualitative methods, summative assessments with quantitative methods remain underdeveloped, despite their importance in evaluating the final outcomes and demonstrating the effectiveness and accountability of Living Lab interventions. So far, there is limited documented experience and guidance on precise processes, tools, and methods on how to construct a summative and integrated impact assessment of Living Labs that is scientifically robust and operational., This study addresses this gap by demonstrating and detailing a novel and process-oriented framework for developing a summative and integrated impact assessment that is comprehensive, operational, and contextually and broadly useful in comparing the impacts of interventions within a Living Lab and across Living Labs. To achieve this, we draw on a case study of a Living Lab project in Switzerland that integrates multiple existing urban Living Labs. We demonstrate a four-stage process for developing a summative and integrated impact assessment, including a co-design approach as a fundamental component throughout. The process consists of (i) co-specifying the constructs of a summative and integrated impact assessment; (ii) co-creating an intervention-specific Theory of Change (ToC); (iii) translating the ToC into a logical framework with inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impacts; and (iv) defining measurable indicators corresponding to the identified constructs. Finally, we report challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations regarding the experience of co-developing a summative impact assessment. These can support other programs in their impact assessment endeavours.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Bern (CH), Human Resource Development Center (BG), Centre for Development Economics (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.