Bank capital and the minimum corporate tax

Abstract This paper examines whether the Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax reduces bank profitability and regulatory capital, and for which banks the effects are strongest. We use a quarterly exposure-based difference-in-differences design around 2024Q1, where treatment intensity is defined by pre-2024 low-tax exposure among in-scope banks. The analysis uses a quarterly bank-level panel for 2014–2024 and exploits predetermined cross-sectional heterogeneity in low-tax exposure while controlling for bank and quarter fixed effects. The headline estimates show that post-2024 profitability and capital buffers decline more for high-exposure banks: profit after tax falls by about 2.2 basis points of assets per quarter and Tier 1 buffers by about 0.09 percentage points in the baseline specification. Higher low-tax exposure is not interpreted as vulnerability per se. The downside channel is concentrated where high pre-reform low-tax exposure coincides with limited initial capital headroom: event-study, placebo, matched-sample, and split-sample evidence all point to larger post-2024 capital-buffer compression for thin-buffer banks. Overall, the results indicate modest average effects but meaningful tail risk for banks that combine high minimum-tax exposure with thin initial capital buffers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Tax and Public Finance
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-026-09977-1
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bank capital and the minimum corporate tax

Alessandro Chiari
International Tax and Public Finance
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Bank capital and the minimum corporate tax

Alessandro Chiari
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines whether the Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax reduces bank profitability and regulatory capital, and for which banks the effects are strongest. We use a quarterly exposure-based difference-in-differences design around 2024Q1, where treatment intensity is defined by pre-2024 low-tax exposure among in-scope banks. The analysis uses a quarterly bank-level panel for 2014–2024 and exploits predetermined cross-sectional heterogeneity in low-tax exposure while controlling for bank and quarter fixed effects. The headline estimates show that post-2024 profitability and capital buffers decline more for high-exposure banks: profit after tax falls by about 2.2 basis points of assets per quarter and Tier 1 buffers by about 0.09 percentage points in the baseline specification. Higher low-tax exposure is not interpreted as vulnerability per se. The downside channel is concentrated where high pre-reform low-tax exposure coincides with limited initial capital headroom: event-study, placebo, matched-sample, and split-sample evidence all point to larger post-2024 capital-buffer compression for thin-buffer banks. Overall, the results indicate modest average effects but meaningful tail risk for banks that combine high minimum-tax exposure with thin initial capital buffers.

International Tax and Public Finance
Charles University (CZ), Czech National Bank (CZ)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, European Commission, Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.