Methodological quality of health literacy instruments used among school children in Asian countries: a systematic review

Background This study aimed to examine the methodological quality of measurement properties of health literacy instruments used in children, specifically in Asian countries, and to identify the most suitable instrument for field application.Methods This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Health literacy studies conducted between 2013 and 2023 and involving children aged 6–18 years old were identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Only studies that assessed methodological qualities were included. Quality appraisal was conducted using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).Result A total of 10 studies met the inclusion criteria from the screening process. The quality of measurement properties in these studies varied. With 9 items on the COSMIN checklist and 10 studies assessed, this resulted in a total of 90 checklist items evaluated. Based on this, 25 items were classified as very good (primarily for structural validity and general criteria), 7 as adequate (mainly for content validity), 14 as inadequate (mostly for internal consistency), 10 as doubtful (mostly for reliability) and 34 as unknown (primarily for measurement error, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness). Nearly 40% (37.7%) of measurement quality ratings were either unknown or not reported. Among the tools assessed, the 8-item Health Literacy Assessment Tool Chinese version (C-HLAT-8) demonstrated very good quality across most measurement properties compared to others. C-HLAT-8 includes functional, interactive and critical health literacy domains and has been assessed in children aged 11–17 in China.Conclusion Despite the global interest in health literacy, studies focusing on methodological quality in the context of school children and Asian countries remain limited. The C-HLAT 8 emerges as a promising tool for field application due to its strong methodological quality and adaptability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2679556
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological quality of health literacy instruments used among school children in Asian countries: a systematic review

Li Shean Toh, Mahmathi Karuppannan, Luke Sawyers, Nur Aziemah Mohd Fauzi
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Methodological quality of health literacy instruments used among school children in Asian countries: a systematic review

Li Shean Toh, Mahmathi Karuppannan, Luke Sawyers, Nur Aziemah Mohd Fauzi
article en

Abstract

Background This study aimed to examine the methodological quality of measurement properties of health literacy instruments used in children, specifically in Asian countries, and to identify the most suitable instrument for field application.Methods This systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Health literacy studies conducted between 2013 and 2023 and involving children aged 6–18 years old were identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Only studies that assessed methodological qualities were included. Quality appraisal was conducted using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).Result A total of 10 studies met the inclusion criteria from the screening process. The quality of measurement properties in these studies varied. With 9 items on the COSMIN checklist and 10 studies assessed, this resulted in a total of 90 checklist items evaluated. Based on this, 25 items were classified as very good (primarily for structural validity and general criteria), 7 as adequate (mainly for content validity), 14 as inadequate (mostly for internal consistency), 10 as doubtful (mostly for reliability) and 34 as unknown (primarily for measurement error, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness). Nearly 40% (37.7%) of measurement quality ratings were either unknown or not reported. Among the tools assessed, the 8-item Health Literacy Assessment Tool Chinese version (C-HLAT-8) demonstrated very good quality across most measurement properties compared to others. C-HLAT-8 includes functional, interactive and critical health literacy domains and has been assessed in children aged 11–17 in China.Conclusion Despite the global interest in health literacy, studies focusing on methodological quality in the context of school children and Asian countries remain limited. The C-HLAT 8 emerges as a promising tool for field application due to its strong methodological quality and adaptability.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and PracticeVol. 19(1)
University of Medicine Tirana (AL), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.