Traditionalism mediates social learning: Biases in acceptance of novel health interventions among Himba pastoralists

Abstract Background and objectives Applying social learning biases to healthcare decision-making may help explain why some people decide not to adopt health interventions. Traits like market integration and traditionalism can shape social learning biases, particularly in small scale populations with little formal education and distrust of outgroup populations. This study investigates the role of these features on social learning biases across four different health interventions among Himba pastoralists of northern Namibia. Methodology Using vignettes from 473 participants sampled in 16 communities, we compare three social learning biases (conformity, prestige bias, parochialism) in four novel healthcare interventions. Participants completed a set of questions to estimate traditionalism and market integration. Multilevel models compared the impact of these variables on the probability of adopting the healthcare interventions. Results Across social learning biases, conformity showed the strongest effect on likelihood of adoption, whereas we found no difference in the prestige bias condition (compared to conformity). More market integrated participants tended to be more likely to adopt interventions, whereas more traditional participants were less likely to adopt when the outgroup advocated adoption or when most of the community didn’t adopt the intervention. Conclusions and implications These results indicate conformity biases play a strong role in considerations about novel health interventions in indigenous communities, but also that traditional values are instrumental in shaping social learning biases. While previous focus has centered on market integration as a key predictor, we found the degree of traditionalism to be a critical and thus far underappreciated factor in mediating social learning. Lay summary Adopting novel health interventions often relies on social learning, but we know little about which biases are at play or the mediating factors influencing them. Using a vignette study with Himba pastoralists, this research highlights the importance of conformity, but also that traditionalism is critical in shaping healthcare decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolution Medicine and Public Health
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoag012
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditionalism mediates social learning: Biases in acceptance of novel health interventions among Himba pastoralists

Brooke A. Scelza, Aparício Lopes Júnior, Sean P. Prall, Annabelle Savastio et al.
Evolution Medicine and Public Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Traditionalism mediates social learning: Biases in acceptance of novel health interventions among Himba pastoralists

Brooke A. Scelza, Aparício Lopes Júnior, Sean P. Prall, Annabelle Savastio, Kassandra Schleper
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and objectives Applying social learning biases to healthcare decision-making may help explain why some people decide not to adopt health interventions. Traits like market integration and traditionalism can shape social learning biases, particularly in small scale populations with little formal education and distrust of outgroup populations. This study investigates the role of these features on social learning biases across four different health interventions among Himba pastoralists of northern Namibia. Methodology Using vignettes from 473 participants sampled in 16 communities, we compare three social learning biases (conformity, prestige bias, parochialism) in four novel healthcare interventions. Participants completed a set of questions to estimate traditionalism and market integration. Multilevel models compared the impact of these variables on the probability of adopting the healthcare interventions. Results Across social learning biases, conformity showed the strongest effect on likelihood of adoption, whereas we found no difference in the prestige bias condition (compared to conformity). More market integrated participants tended to be more likely to adopt interventions, whereas more traditional participants were less likely to adopt when the outgroup advocated adoption or when most of the community didn’t adopt the intervention. Conclusions and implications These results indicate conformity biases play a strong role in considerations about novel health interventions in indigenous communities, but also that traditional values are instrumental in shaping social learning biases. While previous focus has centered on market integration as a key predictor, we found the degree of traditionalism to be a critical and thus far underappreciated factor in mediating social learning. Lay summary Adopting novel health interventions often relies on social learning, but we know little about which biases are at play or the mediating factors influencing them. Using a vignette study with Himba pastoralists, this research highlights the importance of conformity, but also that traditionalism is critical in shaping healthcare decisions.

Evolution Medicine and Public Health
University of Namibia (NA), UCLA Health (US), UCLA Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.