Deep Learning-Based Assessment of the Relation Between the Third Molar and Mandibular Canal on Panoramic Radiographs Using Local, Centralized, and Federated Learning in a Simulated Multi-Center Setting

Impaction of the mandibular third molar in proximity to the mandibular canal increases the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Panoramic radiography is routinely used to assess this relationship. Automated classification of molar–canal overlap could support clinical triage and reduce unnecessary CBCT referrals, while Federated Learning (FL) enables multi-center collaboration without sharing patient data. We compared Local Learning (LL), FL, and Centralized Learning (CL) for binary overlap/no-overlap classification on cropped panoramic radiographs partitioned across eight independent labelers in a simulated heterogeneous multi-center setting. A pretrained ResNet-34 was trained under each paradigm and evaluated using per-client metrics with locally optimized thresholds and pooled test performance with a global threshold. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and threshold-based metrics, alongside training dynamics, Grad-CAM visualizations, and server-side aggregate monitoring signals. On the test set, CL achieved the highest performance (AUC 0.831; accuracy ≈ 0.782), FL showed intermediate performance (AUC 0.757; accuracy ≈ 0.703), and LL generalized poorly across clients (AUC range ≈ 0.619–0.734; mean ≈ 0.672). Training curves suggested overfitting, particularly in LL models, and Grad-CAM indicated more anatomically focused attention in CL and FL. Overall, centralized training provided the strongest performance, while FL offers a privacy-preserving alternative that outperforms LL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126154
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-Based Assessment of the Relation Between the Third Molar and Mandibular Canal on Panoramic Radiographs Using Local, Centralized, and Federated Learning in a Simulated Multi-Center Setting

Mostafa Aldesoki, Ahmad Badruddin Ghazali, Julien Issa, Akhilanand Chaurasia et al.
Applied Sciences
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Deep Learning-Based Assessment of the Relation Between the Third Molar and Mandibular Canal on Panoramic Radiographs Using Local, Centralized, and Federated Learning in a Simulated Multi-Center Setting

Mostafa Aldesoki, Ahmad Badruddin Ghazali, Julien Issa, Akhilanand Chaurasia, Ruben Pauwels, Basel Khalil, Sayeh Ehsani, Sara Haghighat, Sanyam Jain, Johan Andreas Balle Rubak, Rishi Ramani, Faezeh Dehghan Ghanatkaman
article en

Abstract

Impaction of the mandibular third molar in proximity to the mandibular canal increases the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Panoramic radiography is routinely used to assess this relationship. Automated classification of molar–canal overlap could support clinical triage and reduce unnecessary CBCT referrals, while Federated Learning (FL) enables multi-center collaboration without sharing patient data. We compared Local Learning (LL), FL, and Centralized Learning (CL) for binary overlap/no-overlap classification on cropped panoramic radiographs partitioned across eight independent labelers in a simulated heterogeneous multi-center setting. A pretrained ResNet-34 was trained under each paradigm and evaluated using per-client metrics with locally optimized thresholds and pooled test performance with a global threshold. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and threshold-based metrics, alongside training dynamics, Grad-CAM visualizations, and server-side aggregate monitoring signals. On the test set, CL achieved the highest performance (AUC 0.831; accuracy ≈ 0.782), FL showed intermediate performance (AUC 0.757; accuracy ≈ 0.703), and LL generalized poorly across clients (AUC range ≈ 0.619–0.734; mean ≈ 0.672). Training curves suggested overfitting, particularly in LL models, and Grad-CAM indicated more anatomically focused attention in CL and FL. Overall, centralized training provided the strongest performance, while FL offers a privacy-preserving alternative that outperforms LL.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(12)
University of Louisville (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Aarhus University (DK), Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), King George's Medical University (IN), Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), International Islamic University Malaysia (MY), IS practice (BE), Hannover Re (Germany) (DE)
Aarhus Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.