Investigating students’ engagement with GenAI-supported peer feedback generation in EFL writing

Adopting an exploratory mixed-methods design, this study investigates students’ behavioural, affective, and cognitive engagement with GenAI-supported peer feedback generation in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. Forty-eight Chinese undergraduate students participated in peer review tasks using a ChatGPT-powered chatbot to assess their comments on peer essays and offer improvement suggestions. The data comprised chat logs, screen recordings, written reflections, and survey responses. The findings revealed a prevalent tendency among students to incorporate GenAI feedback into their comment revisions, with approximately 62% of the GenAI suggestions being implemented by students to enhance their comment drafts. They exhibited five cognitive strategies, including (1) focusing on improvement areas, (2) contextualizing, (3) critically assessing, (4) selectively incorporating GenAI suggestions, and (5) continually seeking GenAI feedback on revisions. The participants reported a generally positive attitude toward using GenAI support, perceiving the experience as useful and enjoyable. These findings highlight that integrating GenAI into the feedback process fosters an engaging and reflective learning environment. This study contributes to the theoretical understanding of AI literacy by contextualizing it within EFL writing, offering insights for educators seeking to incorporate GenAI into assessment practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interactive Learning Environments
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2026.2679729
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating students’ engagement with GenAI-supported peer feedback generation in EFL writing

Danling Li, Kai Guo, Mengru Pan, Chun Yip Lai
Interactive Learning Environments
AI in Service Interactions
article

Investigating students’ engagement with GenAI-supported peer feedback generation in EFL writing

Danling Li, Kai Guo, Mengru Pan, Chun Yip Lai
article en

Abstract

Adopting an exploratory mixed-methods design, this study investigates students’ behavioural, affective, and cognitive engagement with GenAI-supported peer feedback generation in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. Forty-eight Chinese undergraduate students participated in peer review tasks using a ChatGPT-powered chatbot to assess their comments on peer essays and offer improvement suggestions. The data comprised chat logs, screen recordings, written reflections, and survey responses. The findings revealed a prevalent tendency among students to incorporate GenAI feedback into their comment revisions, with approximately 62% of the GenAI suggestions being implemented by students to enhance their comment drafts. They exhibited five cognitive strategies, including (1) focusing on improvement areas, (2) contextualizing, (3) critically assessing, (4) selectively incorporating GenAI suggestions, and (5) continually seeking GenAI feedback on revisions. The participants reported a generally positive attitude toward using GenAI support, perceiving the experience as useful and enjoyable. These findings highlight that integrating GenAI into the feedback process fosters an engaging and reflective learning environment. This study contributes to the theoretical understanding of AI literacy by contextualizing it within EFL writing, offering insights for educators seeking to incorporate GenAI into assessment practices.

Interactive Learning Environments
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Shenzhen University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.