The Individual as Evolutionarily Significant Unit of Itself: Toward a Unified Framework

The concept of Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU), introduced by Ryder (1986) for conservation genetics, defines populations with distinct evolutionary legacies worthy of preservation. We propose its radical logical extension: every individual organism constitutes, de jure and de facto, an ESU of itself. Drawing from biological individuality theory (Hull, 1980; Godfrey-Smith, 2009), epigenetics, individual selection theory (Williams, 1966; Mayr, 1963), combinatorial genetics, biosemiotics (von Uexküll, 1909), and stochastic developmental biology, we construct a multi-axis demonstration that no two individuals — across any sexually reproducing species, and arguably beyond — share identical biological identity. This irrepeatability is not merely statistical but ontological, evolutionarily consequential, and ethically significant. We argue for a new integrative field: Individual Evolutionary Ontology (IEO).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20728024
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Individual as Evolutionarily Significant Unit of Itself: Toward a Unified Framework

Gabriele Piazzolla
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and History of Science
preprint

The Individual as Evolutionarily Significant Unit of Itself: Toward a Unified Framework

Gabriele Piazzolla
preprint en

Abstract

The concept of Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU), introduced by Ryder (1986) for conservation genetics, defines populations with distinct evolutionary legacies worthy of preservation. We propose its radical logical extension: every individual organism constitutes, de jure and de facto, an ESU of itself. Drawing from biological individuality theory (Hull, 1980; Godfrey-Smith, 2009), epigenetics, individual selection theory (Williams, 1966; Mayr, 1963), combinatorial genetics, biosemiotics (von Uexküll, 1909), and stochastic developmental biology, we construct a multi-axis demonstration that no two individuals — across any sexually reproducing species, and arguably beyond — share identical biological identity. This irrepeatability is not merely statistical but ontological, evolutionarily consequential, and ethically significant. We argue for a new integrative field: Individual Evolutionary Ontology (IEO).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life in Land
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.