Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Websites Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

The significant growth in e-commerce has brought intense competition to the business sector. Businesses seeking to stand out in this competition are evaluated by customers not only by the quality of the products they sell, but also by their performance on digital platforms. To measure this evaluation, this study analyzed the website performance of 25 e-commerce companies in Türkiye using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods with eleven technical and user-oriented performance criteria. MAXC (Maximum Criterion) and Skewness Impact Through Distributional Evaluation (SITDE) methods were used to determine the criterion weights of the websites, while CORASO (COmpromise Ranking from Alternative SOlutions) was used to rank the alternatives. According to the results, “total number of visitors” had the highest weight, while “bounce rate” had the lowest weight. According to the CORASO method, the top three performing e-commerce sites were EC1, EC2, and EC3, while the bottom three performing sites were EC11, EC14, and EC20.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21060190
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Websites Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Halime Ünver, Emre Özsalman, Alptekin Ulutaş
Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Websites Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Halime Ünver, Emre Özsalman, Alptekin Ulutaş
article en

Abstract

The significant growth in e-commerce has brought intense competition to the business sector. Businesses seeking to stand out in this competition are evaluated by customers not only by the quality of the products they sell, but also by their performance on digital platforms. To measure this evaluation, this study analyzed the website performance of 25 e-commerce companies in Türkiye using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods with eleven technical and user-oriented performance criteria. MAXC (Maximum Criterion) and Skewness Impact Through Distributional Evaluation (SITDE) methods were used to determine the criterion weights of the websites, while CORASO (COmpromise Ranking from Alternative SOlutions) was used to rank the alternatives. According to the results, “total number of visitors” had the highest weight, while “bounce rate” had the lowest weight. According to the CORASO method, the top three performing e-commerce sites were EC1, EC2, and EC3, while the bottom three performing sites were EC11, EC14, and EC20.

Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce researchVol. 21(6)
Inonu University (TR)
Inönü Üniversitesi
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.