Mapping Corporate Environment, Social, and Governance Discourses: Analysis of Korean Companies' Sustainability Reports (2014–2024)

ABSTRACT Corporations increasingly use Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports to articulate their commitments, priorities, and performance in sustainability governance. This study examines how Korean firms have configured and reconfigured their sustainability discourses across industries and time using 634 sustainability reports (2014–2024) from the 200 largest companies. Using Structural Topic Modeling (STM), this study identifies 13 topics and a phased shift in emphasis: corporate social responsibility and basic environmental management (2014–2018); workplace safety and digital transformation (2019–2022); and carbon neutrality and supply‐chain management (2023–2024). Sectoral analysis highlights differentiated patterns of discursive differentiation across industries: finance and energy show stronger concentration in governance‐ and climate‐related reporting, construction emphasizes safety‐related disclosure, and manufacturing places greater emphasis on environmental management and compliance‐oriented communication. Topic‐network analysis shows distinct ESG pillars but growing cross‐pillar linkages. Taken together, the study contributes to the literature by empirically mapping how ESG reports function as managerial instruments and communicative devices shaped by industry‐specific regulatory pressures and societal expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70760
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Corporate Environment, Social, and Governance Discourses: Analysis of Korean Companies' Sustainability Reports (2014–2024)

Taedong Lee, Sin-Jae Kang, Bohae Na, Dian Wahyu Utami
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Mapping Corporate Environment, Social, and Governance Discourses: Analysis of Korean Companies' Sustainability Reports (2014–2024)

Taedong Lee, Sin-Jae Kang, Bohae Na, Dian Wahyu Utami
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Corporations increasingly use Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports to articulate their commitments, priorities, and performance in sustainability governance. This study examines how Korean firms have configured and reconfigured their sustainability discourses across industries and time using 634 sustainability reports (2014–2024) from the 200 largest companies. Using Structural Topic Modeling (STM), this study identifies 13 topics and a phased shift in emphasis: corporate social responsibility and basic environmental management (2014–2018); workplace safety and digital transformation (2019–2022); and carbon neutrality and supply‐chain management (2023–2024). Sectoral analysis highlights differentiated patterns of discursive differentiation across industries: finance and energy show stronger concentration in governance‐ and climate‐related reporting, construction emphasizes safety‐related disclosure, and manufacturing places greater emphasis on environmental management and compliance‐oriented communication. Topic‐network analysis shows distinct ESG pillars but growing cross‐pillar linkages. Taken together, the study contributes to the literature by empirically mapping how ESG reports function as managerial instruments and communicative devices shaped by industry‐specific regulatory pressures and societal expectations.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.