High-Accuracy Performance of a Simplified Binary Triage System in Military Trauma

Importance: Accurate prehospital triage is critical for prioritizing evacuation and allocating medical resources in combat settings characterized by diagnostic uncertainty and operational constraints. Simplified, judgment-based triage systems may improve feasibility and adherence but require validation under real-world conditions. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a simplified binary field triage system in identifying severely injured trauma casualties under real-world combat conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted between October 27, 2023, and January 19, 2025. The setting was a military prehospital medical system during a recent conflict. Included were military trauma casualties treated and evacuated by the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps. Main Outcomes and Measures: Field triage designations (urgent vs nonurgent) were compared with anatomic injury severity defined by the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS), as well as the need for trauma intervention (NFTI). Primary outcomes included undertriage and overtriage rates. Results: Among 4522 casualties (median [IQR] age, 23 [20-29] years; 4479 male [99%]), a judgment-based binary approach was associated with an undertriage rate, classification as nonurgent despite severe injury, of 8.5% (95% CI, 6.81%-10.54%) among casualties with any injury with an AIS score of 3 or greater. Among casualties with major trauma (ISS ≥16), the undertriage rate was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.25%-5.67%). Corresponding sensitivities were 91.5% (95% CI, 89.46%-93.19%) and 96.4% (95% CI, 94.33%-97.75%), respectively. Overtriage, defined as urgent triage in the absence of severe injury, was 62.7% (95% CI, 60.65%-64.77%). Using the NFTI definition, undertriage was 8.8% (95% CI, 7.33%-10.62%), and overtriage was 50.2% (95% CI, 48.06%-52.32%). In undertriaged patients with major trauma, severe head and thoracic injuries were most common. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a simplified, judgment-based binary field triage system demonstrated high sensitivity with low undertriage for major trauma in combat settings, at the cost of substantial overtriage. These findings support the use of simple triage approaches under operational constraints while highlighting the need to improve detection of less apparent injuries without compromising simplicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Surgery
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2026.2083
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Accuracy Performance of a Simplified Binary Triage System in Military Trauma

Daniel Gelman, Ram Gelman, Avi Benov, Inon Dimand et al.
JAMA Surgery
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

High-Accuracy Performance of a Simplified Binary Triage System in Military Trauma

Daniel Gelman, Ram Gelman, Avi Benov, Inon Dimand, Ariel Furer, Zivan Beer, Tomer Talmy, Pavel Eidelman, Danielle Akler, Inbal Dym, Cole D. Bendor, Irina Radomislensky, Roy Nadler
article en

Abstract

Importance: Accurate prehospital triage is critical for prioritizing evacuation and allocating medical resources in combat settings characterized by diagnostic uncertainty and operational constraints. Simplified, judgment-based triage systems may improve feasibility and adherence but require validation under real-world conditions. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a simplified binary field triage system in identifying severely injured trauma casualties under real-world combat conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted between October 27, 2023, and January 19, 2025. The setting was a military prehospital medical system during a recent conflict. Included were military trauma casualties treated and evacuated by the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps. Main Outcomes and Measures: Field triage designations (urgent vs nonurgent) were compared with anatomic injury severity defined by the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS), as well as the need for trauma intervention (NFTI). Primary outcomes included undertriage and overtriage rates. Results: Among 4522 casualties (median [IQR] age, 23 [20-29] years; 4479 male [99%]), a judgment-based binary approach was associated with an undertriage rate, classification as nonurgent despite severe injury, of 8.5% (95% CI, 6.81%-10.54%) among casualties with any injury with an AIS score of 3 or greater. Among casualties with major trauma (ISS ≥16), the undertriage rate was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.25%-5.67%). Corresponding sensitivities were 91.5% (95% CI, 89.46%-93.19%) and 96.4% (95% CI, 94.33%-97.75%), respectively. Overtriage, defined as urgent triage in the absence of severe injury, was 62.7% (95% CI, 60.65%-64.77%). Using the NFTI definition, undertriage was 8.8% (95% CI, 7.33%-10.62%), and overtriage was 50.2% (95% CI, 48.06%-52.32%). In undertriaged patients with major trauma, severe head and thoracic injuries were most common. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a simplified, judgment-based binary field triage system demonstrated high sensitivity with low undertriage for major trauma in combat settings, at the cost of substantial overtriage. These findings support the use of simple triage approaches under operational constraints while highlighting the need to improve detection of less apparent injuries without compromising simplicity.

JAMA Surgery
Reichman University (IL), Bar-Ilan University (IL), Tel Aviv University (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Hadassah Medical Center (IL), Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.