Continuous Monitoring of Magnetic Fields in AC/DC Electric Rail Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Light and Heavy Rail Passenger Exposure

Electrification of public transit is central to sustainable urban development, yet it introduces passenger exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MFs), which the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). This study presents a systematic cross-platform comparison of ELF-MF exposure in direct current (DC) light rail and alternating current (AC) heavy rail systems operating under a single national regulatory framework. A total of 9100 continuous measurements were collected across 28 trips on the Tel Aviv Red Line light rail transit (1500 V DC) and the Israel Railways Tel Aviv–Binyamina corridor (25 kV, 50 Hz AC) during 23–26 November 2025, using calibrated Tenmars TM-192D gaussmeters. Mean passenger seat magnetic flux density was 0.226 ± 0.147 µT (2.26 ± 1.47 mG) for the DC system and 0.900 ± 0.606 µT (9.00 ± 6.06 mG) for the AC system. The difference was highly significant (Welch’s t = −73.06, p < 0.001). DC light rail exposure remained consistently below Israel’s precautionary 0.4 µT (4 mG) threshold for continuous public exposure, whereas AC heavy rail mean levels exceeded this threshold in every monitored trip while remaining far below ICNIRP general public reference levels. These findings highlight a “Green Dilemma” in sustainable transport policy: the environmental benefits of rail electrification must be balanced with prudent electromagnetic exposure management in jurisdictions applying strict precautionary limits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126227
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous Monitoring of Magnetic Fields in AC/DC Electric Rail Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Light and Heavy Rail Passenger Exposure

Stelian Gelberg, Liran Shmuel Raz-Steinkrycer, Boris A. Portnov, E. Ne’eman
Sustainability
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Continuous Monitoring of Magnetic Fields in AC/DC Electric Rail Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Light and Heavy Rail Passenger Exposure

Stelian Gelberg, Liran Shmuel Raz-Steinkrycer, Boris A. Portnov, E. Ne’eman
article en

Abstract

Electrification of public transit is central to sustainable urban development, yet it introduces passenger exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MFs), which the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). This study presents a systematic cross-platform comparison of ELF-MF exposure in direct current (DC) light rail and alternating current (AC) heavy rail systems operating under a single national regulatory framework. A total of 9100 continuous measurements were collected across 28 trips on the Tel Aviv Red Line light rail transit (1500 V DC) and the Israel Railways Tel Aviv–Binyamina corridor (25 kV, 50 Hz AC) during 23–26 November 2025, using calibrated Tenmars TM-192D gaussmeters. Mean passenger seat magnetic flux density was 0.226 ± 0.147 µT (2.26 ± 1.47 mG) for the DC system and 0.900 ± 0.606 µT (9.00 ± 6.06 mG) for the AC system. The difference was highly significant (Welch’s t = −73.06, p < 0.001). DC light rail exposure remained consistently below Israel’s precautionary 0.4 µT (4 mG) threshold for continuous public exposure, whereas AC heavy rail mean levels exceeded this threshold in every monitored trip while remaining far below ICNIRP general public reference levels. These findings highlight a “Green Dilemma” in sustainable transport policy: the environmental benefits of rail electrification must be balanced with prudent electromagnetic exposure management in jurisdictions applying strict precautionary limits.

SustainabilityVol. 18(12)
Ministry of Environmental Protection (IL), University of Haifa (IL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.