Learning cognates, false cognates, and noncognates contextually through reading <i>Do contextual support and cross-linguistic awareness matter?</i>

Abstract Lexical acquisition often occurs through reading, yet little research has compared how cognates, false cognates, and noncognates are learned contextually through reading. To this end, we conducted a week-long pretest-training-posttest study with 54 adult Polish learners of English. During three sessions on consecutive days, participants read 45 short stories (170–317 words) containing 90 target keywords (30 cognates, 30 noncognates, 30 false cognates). We examined how word type, context informativeness, and number of keywords occurrences affected keyword learning. Additionally, participants were randomly assigned to a control or awareness-raising group, the latter trained to notice cross-linguistic similarities. Mixed-effects models showed learning of all word types at immediate posttest, with cognates being learned the most and false cognates the least. Higher context informativeness and more keyword occurrences improved learning for all keywords, but false cognates benefited the most from contextual clues. However, raising awareness of cross-linguistic similarity did not enhance contextual learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263126101831
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning cognates, false cognates, and noncognates contextually through reading Do contextual support and cross-linguistic awareness matter?

Katarzyna Kutyłowska, Małgorzata Foryś‐Nogala, Breno B. Silva, Agnieszka Otwinowska et al.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Learning cognates, false cognates, and noncognates contextually through reading Do contextual support and cross-linguistic awareness matter?

Katarzyna Kutyłowska, Małgorzata Foryś‐Nogala, Breno B. Silva, Agnieszka Otwinowska, Jakub Szewczyk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Lexical acquisition often occurs through reading, yet little research has compared how cognates, false cognates, and noncognates are learned contextually through reading. To this end, we conducted a week-long pretest-training-posttest study with 54 adult Polish learners of English. During three sessions on consecutive days, participants read 45 short stories (170–317 words) containing 90 target keywords (30 cognates, 30 noncognates, 30 false cognates). We examined how word type, context informativeness, and number of keywords occurrences affected keyword learning. Additionally, participants were randomly assigned to a control or awareness-raising group, the latter trained to notice cross-linguistic similarities. Mixed-effects models showed learning of all word types at immediate posttest, with cognates being learned the most and false cognates the least. Higher context informativeness and more keyword occurrences improved learning for all keywords, but false cognates benefited the most from contextual clues. However, raising awareness of cross-linguistic similarity did not enhance contextual learning.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
European Commission, Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.