Non-specialist delivered psychosocial care after war and interpersonal violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of non-specialist provider-delivered care for mood and anxiety disorders has been established, but effects in violence-exposed populations remain unclear. We examine the net effectiveness of psychosocial treatments delivered by non-specialists to adults experiencing distress following interpersonal and war-related violence. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and SciELO from Jan 1, 2000, to June 1, 2025. Studies were included if they were psychosocial treatment randomised controlled trials for adults exposed to violence; additionally, the treatment had to be delivered by a non-specialist provider. Pairs of authors double-screened and double-extracted data by applying a codebook developed for this study. We extracted information on data, population characteristics, and four primary outcomes (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and impairment symptom severity), and used standardised checklists to assess risk of bias. We pooled study-level data in pairwise meta-analyses using a random-effects model to examine subgroup differences by national setting, treatment setting, provider type, violence type, and treatment focus. Our study did not involve people with lived experience of mental health conditions. This protocol was registered a priori with PROSPERO (CRD42022306099). FINDINGS: =77-84%. INTERPRETATION: Small to moderate clinical benefits for non-specialist-delivered care were observed across a broad set of treatments for diverse populations exposed to violence worldwide. These comprehensive analyses can inform psychosocial programming related to setting, providers, types of violence, and treatment foci, to combine treatment and implementation approaches for specific settings and populations. FUNDING: None.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Psychiatry
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(26)00123-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-specialist delivered psychosocial care after war and interpersonal violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Davide Papola, Abhijit Nadkarni, Anushka Patel, Vikram Patel et al.
1 citations
The Lancet Psychiatry
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
18.48
article

Non-specialist delivered psychosocial care after war and interpersonal violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Davide Papola, Abhijit Nadkarni, Anushka Patel, Vikram Patel, Kelly Dixon, Ginger Ramirez, Daryll Wilson, Bijayalaxmi Biswal, Erin McGuinness, Aman Bariya-Sousa, Anna Zettelmeyer, Luanna Fernandes, Sarah Taha, Astha Awasthi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of non-specialist provider-delivered care for mood and anxiety disorders has been established, but effects in violence-exposed populations remain unclear. We examine the net effectiveness of psychosocial treatments delivered by non-specialists to adults experiencing distress following interpersonal and war-related violence. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and SciELO from Jan 1, 2000, to June 1, 2025. Studies were included if they were psychosocial treatment randomised controlled trials for adults exposed to violence; additionally, the treatment had to be delivered by a non-specialist provider. Pairs of authors double-screened and double-extracted data by applying a codebook developed for this study. We extracted information on data, population characteristics, and four primary outcomes (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and impairment symptom severity), and used standardised checklists to assess risk of bias. We pooled study-level data in pairwise meta-analyses using a random-effects model to examine subgroup differences by national setting, treatment setting, provider type, violence type, and treatment focus. Our study did not involve people with lived experience of mental health conditions. This protocol was registered a priori with PROSPERO (CRD42022306099). FINDINGS: =77-84%. INTERPRETATION: Small to moderate clinical benefits for non-specialist-delivered care were observed across a broad set of treatments for diverse populations exposed to violence worldwide. These comprehensive analyses can inform psychosocial programming related to setting, providers, types of violence, and treatment foci, to combine treatment and implementation approaches for specific settings and populations. FUNDING: None.

The Lancet PsychiatryVol. 13(7)
University of Verona (IT), Harvard University (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Sangath (IN), Center for Pain and the Brain (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
National Institutes of Health
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
18.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.