Oral Cancer Numerical Index (OCNI): Development and Validation of a Cytology-Based Risk Assessment for Oral Lesions

Background/Objectives: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) require accurate risk stratification to identify patients at the highest risk for severe oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) or oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We developed and internally validated the oral cancer numerical index (OCNI), a quantitative risk score derived from clinical features and deep learning-based brush cytology measurements. Methods: This retrospective model development and internal validation study was conducted using data from the multicenter Grand Opportunity study. Prospectively recruited subjects with OPMD with complete data were divided at the subject level into a training set (n = 384) and a holdout test set (n = 164) using a 70:30 diagnosis-stratified split. The primary endpoint was severe OED or OSCC versus benign diagnoses, and mild and moderate OED. Predictors included age, sex, tobacco history, lesion color, lesion size, multiple lesions, ulcerative morphology, and the percentages of differentiated squamous epithelial and small round cells derived from deep learning-based cytology. Prespecified rule-out and rule-in thresholds were selected in the training set to target 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity, respectively, and then applied to the holdout test set. Results: At the prespecified rule-out threshold (OCNI ≤ 37.6), sensitivity was 92% and negative predictive value was 97%. At the rule-in threshold (OCNI > 60.0), specificity was 89% and positive predictive value was 67%. Calibration was good in the holdout set (intercept, −0.07; slope, 1.13; Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.36), and OCNI increased significantly with worsening histopathologic severity. Conclusions: OCNI provided an objective, clinically interpretable estimate of risk for severe OED or OSCC, with strong rule-out and rule-in performance and good calibration. These findings support further external validation of OCNI as an adjunctive tool for oral lesion risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124692
Primary Topic
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Cancer Numerical Index (OCNI): Development and Validation of a Cytology-Based Risk Assessment for Oral Lesions

Nicolaos Christodoulides, Rachelle Wolk, Michael P. McRae, Alexander Ross Kerr et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
article

Oral Cancer Numerical Index (OCNI): Development and Validation of a Cytology-Based Risk Assessment for Oral Lesions

Nicolaos Christodoulides, Rachelle Wolk, Michael P. McRae, Alexander Ross Kerr, Kritika Srinivasan Rajsri, Craig Murdoch, Nancy Ruel, John T. McDevitt, Nadarajah Vigneswaran, Martin H. Thornhill, Spencer W. Redding, Pooja Gaikwad, Paul M. Speight
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) require accurate risk stratification to identify patients at the highest risk for severe oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) or oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We developed and internally validated the oral cancer numerical index (OCNI), a quantitative risk score derived from clinical features and deep learning-based brush cytology measurements. Methods: This retrospective model development and internal validation study was conducted using data from the multicenter Grand Opportunity study. Prospectively recruited subjects with OPMD with complete data were divided at the subject level into a training set (n = 384) and a holdout test set (n = 164) using a 70:30 diagnosis-stratified split. The primary endpoint was severe OED or OSCC versus benign diagnoses, and mild and moderate OED. Predictors included age, sex, tobacco history, lesion color, lesion size, multiple lesions, ulcerative morphology, and the percentages of differentiated squamous epithelial and small round cells derived from deep learning-based cytology. Prespecified rule-out and rule-in thresholds were selected in the training set to target 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity, respectively, and then applied to the holdout test set. Results: At the prespecified rule-out threshold (OCNI ≤ 37.6), sensitivity was 92% and negative predictive value was 97%. At the rule-in threshold (OCNI > 60.0), specificity was 89% and positive predictive value was 67%. Calibration was good in the holdout set (intercept, −0.07; slope, 1.13; Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.36), and OCNI increased significantly with worsening histopathologic severity. Conclusions: OCNI provided an objective, clinically interpretable estimate of risk for severe OED or OSCC, with strong rule-out and rule-in performance and good calibration. These findings support further external validation of OCNI as an adjunctive tool for oral lesion risk stratification.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(12)
Custom Electronics (United States) (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), New York University (US), University of Sheffield (GB), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Texas at San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, York University, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.