Understanding ecosystem service preferences through human values

Social valuation research identifies ecosystem service preferences effectively, but is less well equipped to explain why those preferences form and vary across people and groups. Explanatory efforts have typically relied on socio-demographic and place-based variables despite inconsistent predictive power. Drawing on Schwartz’s Theory of Basic Human Values, we test whether higher-order value orientations help to explain ecosystem service preferences. Using a US survey sample of adults (N = 790), we combined a social assessment of preferences for 17 ecosystem services with the Portrait Values Questionnaire. Results show that value orientations, particularly self-transcendence and openness to change, explain meaningful variation in ecosystem service preferences and show greater explanatory power than socio-demographic and broad landscape variables. Self-transcendence was the strongest and most consistent predictor across service categories, while openness to change was positively associated with provisioning and cultural services. These findings highlight human values as a useful framework for interpreting ecosystem service preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2026.2682906
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding ecosystem service preferences through human values

Rachel McGovern, Scott Greeves, Rebecca Bergee
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Understanding ecosystem service preferences through human values

Rachel McGovern, Scott Greeves, Rebecca Bergee
article en

Abstract

Social valuation research identifies ecosystem service preferences effectively, but is less well equipped to explain why those preferences form and vary across people and groups. Explanatory efforts have typically relied on socio-demographic and place-based variables despite inconsistent predictive power. Drawing on Schwartz’s Theory of Basic Human Values, we test whether higher-order value orientations help to explain ecosystem service preferences. Using a US survey sample of adults (N = 790), we combined a social assessment of preferences for 17 ecosystem services with the Portrait Values Questionnaire. Results show that value orientations, particularly self-transcendence and openness to change, explain meaningful variation in ecosystem service preferences and show greater explanatory power than socio-demographic and broad landscape variables. Self-transcendence was the strongest and most consistent predictor across service categories, while openness to change was positively associated with provisioning and cultural services. These findings highlight human values as a useful framework for interpreting ecosystem service preferences.

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
University of Idaho (US), Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation (US), Clemson University (US)
University of Tennessee
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.