Comparison of Methane Cracking by Pulse Dielectric Barrier Discharge and Spark Discharge: Interaction between Plasma Energy Density, Hydrogen Production Rate, and Carbon Morphology

To overcome the efficiency and coking bottlenecks of conventional methane-to-hydrogen technologies, this study systematically compares pulsed Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) and Spark Discharge (SD) plasma configurations. We quantified the impacts of electrical modulation and reactor geometry on methane cracking efficiency and product selectivity via in situ optical emission spectroscopy (OES), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Optimal methane conversion (82%) and ECE (60%) were observed in the DBD system at 25 kV and 500–700 Hz. In comparison, the SD configuration leverages higher energy density at 150 kV to drive deep cracking pathways, yielding a hydrogen selectivity of nearly 98%. The distinct performance stems from divergent radical evolution: OES spectra revealed that SD promotes Hα and C 2 emissions ─ indicators of extensive C–H bond cleavage─whereas DBD was restricted to CH-dominated primary activation. This shift in cracking depth directly dictates the solid-phase morphology, where SD facilitates the growth of graphitic fibrous or tubular carbon, contrasting with the defective amorphous carbon deposited in DBD. These findings offer a mechanistic basis for tailoring plasma modes to specific hydrogen and carbon product requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6c01439
Primary Topic
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Methane Cracking by Pulse Dielectric Barrier Discharge and Spark Discharge: Interaction between Plasma Energy Density, Hydrogen Production Rate, and Carbon Morphology

Fang Liu, 王崇軒, C Z Wang, Li Yang et al.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of Methane Cracking by Pulse Dielectric Barrier Discharge and Spark Discharge: Interaction between Plasma Energy Density, Hydrogen Production Rate, and Carbon Morphology

Fang Liu, 王崇軒, C Z Wang, Li Yang, Ningning Li, Yumin Chen, Y Zhou
article en

Abstract

To overcome the efficiency and coking bottlenecks of conventional methane-to-hydrogen technologies, this study systematically compares pulsed Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) and Spark Discharge (SD) plasma configurations. We quantified the impacts of electrical modulation and reactor geometry on methane cracking efficiency and product selectivity via in situ optical emission spectroscopy (OES), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Optimal methane conversion (82%) and ECE (60%) were observed in the DBD system at 25 kV and 500–700 Hz. In comparison, the SD configuration leverages higher energy density at 150 kV to drive deep cracking pathways, yielding a hydrogen selectivity of nearly 98%. The distinct performance stems from divergent radical evolution: OES spectra revealed that SD promotes Hα and C 2 emissions ─ indicators of extensive C–H bond cleavage─whereas DBD was restricted to CH-dominated primary activation. This shift in cracking depth directly dictates the solid-phase morphology, where SD facilitates the growth of graphitic fibrous or tubular carbon, contrasting with the defective amorphous carbon deposited in DBD. These findings offer a mechanistic basis for tailoring plasma modes to specific hydrogen and carbon product requirements.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), National Institute of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.