ChatGPT and the fate of the undergraduate essay in the humanities: interpreting initial responses from Stellenbosch University

In early 2023, the use of OpenAI’s ChatGPT became apparent in undergraduate courses in South African universities. In the Humanities and Social Sciences, where most disciplines rely on essays for training and assessment, this development produced considerable anxiety and, over the following years, led to reconsiderations of teaching and learning in the humanities at Stellenbosch University. Amid the ongoing scramble to refashion assessments, it is important to consider the stakes of undergraduate humanities education. To address this in a preliminary way, our paper begins by briefly situating undergraduate training in humanities in South Africa and discusses the role of the essay in the humanities and the multiple processes (or “skills”) involved in essay writing. It then draws on interviews and experiences of academics in the humanities at Stellenbosch University during the initial period of the use of ChatGPT, recording some of the anxieties of that moment as well as the aspirations for ways to work around its use. Our paper concludes by attempting to conceptualise the implications of allowing large language models to produce essays for students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Dynamics
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2026.2680842
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT and the fate of the undergraduate essay in the humanities: interpreting initial responses from Stellenbosch University

Bernard Dubbeld, Lloyd Hill, Ava van Huyssteen
Social Dynamics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

ChatGPT and the fate of the undergraduate essay in the humanities: interpreting initial responses from Stellenbosch University

Bernard Dubbeld, Lloyd Hill, Ava van Huyssteen
article en

Abstract

In early 2023, the use of OpenAI’s ChatGPT became apparent in undergraduate courses in South African universities. In the Humanities and Social Sciences, where most disciplines rely on essays for training and assessment, this development produced considerable anxiety and, over the following years, led to reconsiderations of teaching and learning in the humanities at Stellenbosch University. Amid the ongoing scramble to refashion assessments, it is important to consider the stakes of undergraduate humanities education. To address this in a preliminary way, our paper begins by briefly situating undergraduate training in humanities in South Africa and discusses the role of the essay in the humanities and the multiple processes (or “skills”) involved in essay writing. It then draws on interviews and experiences of academics in the humanities at Stellenbosch University during the initial period of the use of ChatGPT, recording some of the anxieties of that moment as well as the aspirations for ways to work around its use. Our paper concludes by attempting to conceptualise the implications of allowing large language models to produce essays for students.

Social Dynamics
Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.