Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Modern risk-adapted management of thyroid cancer involves risk stratification as an active, dynamic process that begins with the detection of a thyroid nodule and continues throughout the clinical course of diagnosis, active surveillance or treatment, and follow-up. Rooted in clinicopathological staging, which can be further refined with the molecular risk characterization of the tumor, initial management plans are developed and modified over time on the basis of the natural history of the disease and the response to therapy. We present a clinical framework for therapeutic decision making that can be used to compare, contrast, and illustrate the relative risks, benefits, and patient preferences that are integral to the development of a personalized management plan. We examine examples of therapeutic decision making in active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer, minimalist therapeutic management options for low- and intermediate-risk thyroid cancer, and systemic therapies for advanced thyroid cancer, showing how the therapeutic decision-making framework can be used to achieve informed consensus and management recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra2416814
Primary Topic
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Lori J. Wirth, R Michael Tuttle, Laszlo Hegedüs
New England Journal of Medicine
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Lori J. Wirth, R Michael Tuttle, Laszlo Hegedüs
article en

Abstract

Modern risk-adapted management of thyroid cancer involves risk stratification as an active, dynamic process that begins with the detection of a thyroid nodule and continues throughout the clinical course of diagnosis, active surveillance or treatment, and follow-up. Rooted in clinicopathological staging, which can be further refined with the molecular risk characterization of the tumor, initial management plans are developed and modified over time on the basis of the natural history of the disease and the response to therapy. We present a clinical framework for therapeutic decision making that can be used to compare, contrast, and illustrate the relative risks, benefits, and patient preferences that are integral to the development of a personalized management plan. We examine examples of therapeutic decision making in active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer, minimalist therapeutic management options for low- and intermediate-risk thyroid cancer, and systemic therapies for advanced thyroid cancer, showing how the therapeutic decision-making framework can be used to achieve informed consensus and management recommendations.

New England Journal of MedicineVol. 394(23)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.