International Evidence on the Impact of Macro‐Prudential Policies on Bank Systemic Risk

ABSTRACT This paper analyses the impact of macro‐prudential policies on bank systemic risk worldwide. Using data from 63 countries over 2001–2017, I find strong evidence that macro‐prudential policies are effective in reducing systemic risk at the country level. The effectiveness of macro‐prudential policies differs across countries in the sample. Macro‐prudential policies are more effective in reducing systemic risk in countries with more advanced economic development, with a higher degree of concentration in the banking sector, and with less stringent micro‐prudential regulations. Bank‐level evidence suggests that bank size matters. The impact of macro‐prudential policies on constraining bank systemic risk is more pronounced for large banks. Results are robust to the use of instrumental variables to address potential concerns, and to the inclusion of additional controls to account for the impact of alternate tools that might be used to foster financial stability. These results have policy implications for effective conduct of macro‐prudential policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Finance
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70040
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Evidence on the Impact of Macro‐Prudential Policies on Bank Systemic Risk

Wenqing Gao
International Finance
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

International Evidence on the Impact of Macro‐Prudential Policies on Bank Systemic Risk

Wenqing Gao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper analyses the impact of macro‐prudential policies on bank systemic risk worldwide. Using data from 63 countries over 2001–2017, I find strong evidence that macro‐prudential policies are effective in reducing systemic risk at the country level. The effectiveness of macro‐prudential policies differs across countries in the sample. Macro‐prudential policies are more effective in reducing systemic risk in countries with more advanced economic development, with a higher degree of concentration in the banking sector, and with less stringent micro‐prudential regulations. Bank‐level evidence suggests that bank size matters. The impact of macro‐prudential policies on constraining bank systemic risk is more pronounced for large banks. Results are robust to the use of instrumental variables to address potential concerns, and to the inclusion of additional controls to account for the impact of alternate tools that might be used to foster financial stability. These results have policy implications for effective conduct of macro‐prudential policies.

International Finance
Stephen F. Austin State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.