Biodiversity Monitoring in Food Forests

Food forests are considered as a biodiversity-friendly land use concept. However, there is a lack of extended, systematic and standardised long-term biodiversity monitoring activities to obtain sufficient data on the actual impact of food forestry on biodiversity. In order to improve such approaches, this work aimed to gain an understanding of 1) the current state and professionality level of existing biodiversity monitoring concepts in food forest projects and 2) influencing social-ecological context factors. To this end, I conducted 1) a broad online survey and 2) semi structured interviews with German and Dutch experts from four food forest project cases performing biodiversity monitoring activities to different extents on their site. Among the food forest project (cases), I found heterogeneous characteristics and levels of professionality of the biodiversity monitoring activities, which were primarily attributed to context factors related to actors, governance systems and social, economic, and political settings. For instance, the professionality of biodiversity monitoring activities depended on the availability of volunteers and experts as well as funding opportunities. My results imply that food forest projects interested in professionalised biodiversity monitoring activities could benefit, for example, from expert-based identification tools and data platforms, such as ObsIdentify / Observation.org, as well as collaboration with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and universities. Most importantly, however, they emphasise that food forestry stakeholder (scientists, experts, political actors) must foster the establishment of an integrated, standardised and systematic biodiversity monitoring concept for food forests that includes citizen science (CS) approaches, as well as the institutionalisation of the concept of food forestry in general. Overall, the following work provides valuable insights and implications for biodiversity monitoring activities in food forests projects, which could be used to improve such activities in the future. This is urgently needed to demonstrate the impact of food forestry on biodiversity, and, in turn, increase political and societal support for the concept of food forestry.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubData
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48548/pubdata-3838
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity Monitoring in Food Forests

Jana Marion Böhme
PubData
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Biodiversity Monitoring in Food Forests

Jana Marion Böhme
article en

Abstract

Food forests are considered as a biodiversity-friendly land use concept. However, there is a lack of extended, systematic and standardised long-term biodiversity monitoring activities to obtain sufficient data on the actual impact of food forestry on biodiversity. In order to improve such approaches, this work aimed to gain an understanding of 1) the current state and professionality level of existing biodiversity monitoring concepts in food forest projects and 2) influencing social-ecological context factors. To this end, I conducted 1) a broad online survey and 2) semi structured interviews with German and Dutch experts from four food forest project cases performing biodiversity monitoring activities to different extents on their site. Among the food forest project (cases), I found heterogeneous characteristics and levels of professionality of the biodiversity monitoring activities, which were primarily attributed to context factors related to actors, governance systems and social, economic, and political settings. For instance, the professionality of biodiversity monitoring activities depended on the availability of volunteers and experts as well as funding opportunities. My results imply that food forest projects interested in professionalised biodiversity monitoring activities could benefit, for example, from expert-based identification tools and data platforms, such as ObsIdentify / Observation.org, as well as collaboration with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and universities. Most importantly, however, they emphasise that food forestry stakeholder (scientists, experts, political actors) must foster the establishment of an integrated, standardised and systematic biodiversity monitoring concept for food forests that includes citizen science (CS) approaches, as well as the institutionalisation of the concept of food forestry in general. Overall, the following work provides valuable insights and implications for biodiversity monitoring activities in food forests projects, which could be used to improve such activities in the future. This is urgently needed to demonstrate the impact of food forestry on biodiversity, and, in turn, increase political and societal support for the concept of food forestry.

PubData
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.