The Structure of Law-Application Discretion as a General Theoretical Model of Legal Choice

The article substantiates the structure of law-application discretion as a general theoretical model of legal choice. Discretion is considered not as a defect of legal regulation or a consequence of legislative incompleteness, but as a legally organized mechanism for concretizing law under conditions of legally significant uncertainty. The proposed model includes interrelated elements: the subject, objective, content, teleological, axiological and formal-resultative components, as well as the ground of discretion and the limits separating lawful choice from arbitrariness. Particular attention is paid to the fact that subjects of legal discretion may include not only public authorities, but also private persons when the law grants them a legally meaningful space for choice. The practical significance of the model lies in its applicability to the analysis of judicial and administrative decisions and to the assessment of the reasoning, proportionality and verifiability of law-application choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Studies
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/2500-333x-2026-11-2-42-50
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Structure of Law-Application Discretion as a General Theoretical Model of Legal Choice

Yuriy Onosov
Journal of Legal Studies
Legal and Policy Issues
article

The Structure of Law-Application Discretion as a General Theoretical Model of Legal Choice

Yuriy Onosov
article en

Abstract

The article substantiates the structure of law-application discretion as a general theoretical model of legal choice. Discretion is considered not as a defect of legal regulation or a consequence of legislative incompleteness, but as a legally organized mechanism for concretizing law under conditions of legally significant uncertainty. The proposed model includes interrelated elements: the subject, objective, content, teleological, axiological and formal-resultative components, as well as the ground of discretion and the limits separating lawful choice from arbitrariness. Particular attention is paid to the fact that subjects of legal discretion may include not only public authorities, but also private persons when the law grants them a legally meaningful space for choice. The practical significance of the model lies in its applicability to the analysis of judicial and administrative decisions and to the assessment of the reasoning, proportionality and verifiability of law-application choice.

Journal of Legal StudiesVol. 11(2)
Ural Federal University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.