Uncertainty-aware 3D tumor segmentation with deep ensembles: an evaluation of temporal versus data diversity

OBJECTIVE: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming segmentation tasks in radiotherapy, but model reliability remains a critical concern, particularly for tumor segmentation. While deep ensembles are among the most reliable uncertainty quantification strategies, their computational cost often drives practitioners toward other approaches. This study explores different sources of model diversity to assess the trade-off between training efficiency and reliability.

Approach: Cross-Validation Ensemble (CVE) served as the baseline, compared against two alternative strategies: Checkpoint Ensemble (CPE), a training-efficient approach leveraging temporal diversity from a single training run, and Data Diversity Ensemble (DDE), which enforces strong data diversity through clustering-based subgroup partitioning rather than random data splits. Evaluations were conducted on three 3D tumor segmentation tasks: lung CT (NSCLC), brain MRI (BraTS), and prostate MRI (LUND-PROBE).

Main results: CPE achieves segmentation performance comparable to CVE, with marginal Dice differences (-1.20% on NSCLC, -0.27% on BraTS, and +0.05% on LUND-PROBE), while requiring only a single training run. In contrast, DDE exhibits larger performance degradation on NSCLC (-5.67%), while the differences are smaller on BraTS (-0.81%) and LUND-PROBE (-0.11%). We evaluate reliability by measuring the correlation between Dice and global uncertainty metrics. The results reveal a dataset-dependent pattern: on NSCLC and BraTS, CPE achieves the strongest uncertainty-performance associations, with Spearman correlations between mean foreground entropy and Dice of |ρs| = 0.85 and 0.73, respectively. In contrast, on LUND-PROBE, DDE shows substantially higher correlations (|ρs| = 0.53) compared to CVE and CPE (0.28 and 0.29).

Significance: Our findings highlight that the effectiveness of ensemble diversity for UQ depends on the interplay between dataset characteristics, diversity sources, and evaluation metrics. CPE provides uncertainty estimates comparable to CVE with substantially reduced computational cost, offering a practical trade-off between efficiency and reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae7eeb
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty-aware 3D tumor segmentation with deep ensembles: an evaluation of temporal versus data diversity

Chuxin Zhang, Ana María Barragán Montero, John Aldo Lee, Dany Rimez
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Uncertainty-aware 3D tumor segmentation with deep ensembles: an evaluation of temporal versus data diversity

Chuxin Zhang, Ana María Barragán Montero, John Aldo Lee, Dany Rimez
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming segmentation tasks in radiotherapy, but model reliability remains a critical concern, particularly for tumor segmentation. While deep ensembles are among the most reliable uncertainty quantification strategies, their computational cost often drives practitioners toward other approaches. This study explores different sources of model diversity to assess the trade-off between training efficiency and reliability.

Approach: Cross-Validation Ensemble (CVE) served as the baseline, compared against two alternative strategies: Checkpoint Ensemble (CPE), a training-efficient approach leveraging temporal diversity from a single training run, and Data Diversity Ensemble (DDE), which enforces strong data diversity through clustering-based subgroup partitioning rather than random data splits. Evaluations were conducted on three 3D tumor segmentation tasks: lung CT (NSCLC), brain MRI (BraTS), and prostate MRI (LUND-PROBE).

Main results: CPE achieves segmentation performance comparable to CVE, with marginal Dice differences (-1.20% on NSCLC, -0.27% on BraTS, and +0.05% on LUND-PROBE), while requiring only a single training run. In contrast, DDE exhibits larger performance degradation on NSCLC (-5.67%), while the differences are smaller on BraTS (-0.81%) and LUND-PROBE (-0.11%). We evaluate reliability by measuring the correlation between Dice and global uncertainty metrics. The results reveal a dataset-dependent pattern: on NSCLC and BraTS, CPE achieves the strongest uncertainty-performance associations, with Spearman correlations between mean foreground entropy and Dice of |ρs| = 0.85 and 0.73, respectively. In contrast, on LUND-PROBE, DDE shows substantially higher correlations (|ρs| = 0.53) compared to CVE and CPE (0.28 and 0.29).

Significance: Our findings highlight that the effectiveness of ensemble diversity for UQ depends on the interplay between dataset characteristics, diversity sources, and evaluation metrics. CPE provides uncertainty estimates comparable to CVE with substantially reduced computational cost, offering a practical trade-off between efficiency and reliability.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.