A review of scenario analysis tools for urban green space planning and management

Scenario analysis can help urban green space planning respond to uncertain environmental, social, and policy futures. This systematic review analyzed 157 publications to clarify its applications in green space planning and management. We distinguished two research traditions—studies identifying urban green spaces from land use and land cover data for regional ecological planning (UGS1), and studies examining green infrastructure within built urban environments (UGS2). Using a three-stage framework of scenario analysis, we found clear differences in the geographic distribution, focal issues, scenario construction approaches, and evaluation pathways. UGS1 mainly addressed ecological security and climate-related issues, whereas UGS2 emphasized climate regulation, stormwater management, and urban environmental quality. Overall, systematic evaluation frameworks and stakeholder engagement remained limited. This review identifies five opportunities to make scenario-based green space planning more actionable and decision relevant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.116261
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of scenario analysis tools for urban green space planning and management

XW Wang, Ruixia Wang
iScience
Urban Green Space and Health
article

A review of scenario analysis tools for urban green space planning and management

XW Wang, Ruixia Wang
article en

Abstract

Scenario analysis can help urban green space planning respond to uncertain environmental, social, and policy futures. This systematic review analyzed 157 publications to clarify its applications in green space planning and management. We distinguished two research traditions—studies identifying urban green spaces from land use and land cover data for regional ecological planning (UGS1), and studies examining green infrastructure within built urban environments (UGS2). Using a three-stage framework of scenario analysis, we found clear differences in the geographic distribution, focal issues, scenario construction approaches, and evaluation pathways. UGS1 mainly addressed ecological security and climate-related issues, whereas UGS2 emphasized climate regulation, stormwater management, and urban environmental quality. Overall, systematic evaluation frameworks and stakeholder engagement remained limited. This review identifies five opportunities to make scenario-based green space planning more actionable and decision relevant.

iScienceVol. 29(7)
Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.