Comparative assessment of sustainable agricultural development in Russia and China under climate and resource constraints

Sustainable agricultural development in large continental economies depends on the ability to preserve productivity while adapting to climate stress, resource scarcity and environmental limits. This article compares the trajectories of sustainable agricultural development in Russia and China under conditions of climatic variability, land pressure, water constraints and decarbonization imperatives. The analysis combines national and provincial statistical indicators, comparative policy assessment and a composite framework covering productivity, resource efficiency, environmental pressure and adaptive capacity. Results show that China demonstrates stronger progress in digital agriculture, irrigation management and coordinated green policy implementation, while Russia retains advantages in land availability, lower average cropping pressure and opportunities for climate-driven expansion in selected zones. At the same time, both countries face structural sustainability constraints linked to regional inequality, soil degradation risks and carbon intensity of agricultural production. The study concludes that sustainable agricultural development requires differentiated territorial strategies rather than uniform national models, with stronger emphasis on water governance, low-carbon technologies and adaptive institutional support.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671902006/pdf
Primary Topic
Agricultural Development and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of sustainable agricultural development in Russia and China under climate and resource constraints

Nina Protas, L.‐W. Wei, Natalia Serbina, Yulia Gudoshnikova
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Agricultural Development and Policies
article

Comparative assessment of sustainable agricultural development in Russia and China under climate and resource constraints

Nina Protas, L.‐W. Wei, Natalia Serbina, Yulia Gudoshnikova
article en

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural development in large continental economies depends on the ability to preserve productivity while adapting to climate stress, resource scarcity and environmental limits. This article compares the trajectories of sustainable agricultural development in Russia and China under conditions of climatic variability, land pressure, water constraints and decarbonization imperatives. The analysis combines national and provincial statistical indicators, comparative policy assessment and a composite framework covering productivity, resource efficiency, environmental pressure and adaptive capacity. Results show that China demonstrates stronger progress in digital agriculture, irrigation management and coordinated green policy implementation, while Russia retains advantages in land availability, lower average cropping pressure and opportunities for climate-driven expansion in selected zones. At the same time, both countries face structural sustainability constraints linked to regional inequality, soil degradation risks and carbon intensity of agricultural production. The study concludes that sustainable agricultural development requires differentiated territorial strategies rather than uniform national models, with stronger emphasis on water governance, low-carbon technologies and adaptive institutional support.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agricultural Development and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.