Six actions to harness the potential of social surveys on people and nature relations: A UK cross‐sectoral perspective

Abstract Robust data on the state of relationships between people and nature is a critical component of the evidence base for environmental governance at local, national and global scales. Social surveys are a valuable method already used by some governmental and non‐governmental organisations to gather this evidence. However, a lack of coordination hampers efforts to harness the potential of people‐and‐nature surveys to better inform policy and practice. Specifically, designers and administrators of people‐and‐nature surveys should ensure that surveys are relevant to current policy challenges, robust in their use of socially and statistically validated questions, and the data produced are accessible to diverse communities for research, practice and advocacy. Integrating the experience of a group of UK survey researchers and practitioners, this Perspective identifies six actions to enhance the value of people‐and‐nature surveys for environmental governance: strengthen access to survey data; co‐define meaningful constructs and questions; invest in continuing datasets; mix methods appropriately; track the use and impact of survey insights; and foster partnerships and capacity sharing to enable these actions. Together, these actions could enable people‐and‐nature surveys to better serve user needs, build cross‐scale usability and contribute critical insights on progress towards national and global environmental goals. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70374
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Six actions to harness the potential of social surveys on people and nature relations: A UK cross‐sectoral perspective

Martha E. Crockatt, Daniel Barrios‐O’Neill, Constance L. McDermott, Roz Owen et al.
People and Nature
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Six actions to harness the potential of social surveys on people and nature relations: A UK cross‐sectoral perspective

Martha E. Crockatt, Daniel Barrios‐O’Neill, Constance L. McDermott, Roz Owen, Katrin Wilhelm, Charlotte Simms, Joelene Hughes, Jasper Montana, Diogo Veríssimo, Lea May Anderson, Jordan Rydlewski, Joseph Gent, Mark Hirons, Caitlin Hafferty, Sally Bavin, Ellesse Janda, Jennifer C. Mailley, Tom Marshall, Jonathan Slessor
article en

Abstract

Abstract Robust data on the state of relationships between people and nature is a critical component of the evidence base for environmental governance at local, national and global scales. Social surveys are a valuable method already used by some governmental and non‐governmental organisations to gather this evidence. However, a lack of coordination hampers efforts to harness the potential of people‐and‐nature surveys to better inform policy and practice. Specifically, designers and administrators of people‐and‐nature surveys should ensure that surveys are relevant to current policy challenges, robust in their use of socially and statistically validated questions, and the data produced are accessible to diverse communities for research, practice and advocacy. Integrating the experience of a group of UK survey researchers and practitioners, this Perspective identifies six actions to enhance the value of people‐and‐nature surveys for environmental governance: strengthen access to survey data; co‐define meaningful constructs and questions; invest in continuing datasets; mix methods appropriately; track the use and impact of survey insights; and foster partnerships and capacity sharing to enable these actions. Together, these actions could enable people‐and‐nature surveys to better serve user needs, build cross‐scale usability and contribute critical insights on progress towards national and global environmental goals. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and Nature
Australian National University (AU), Leiden University (NL), Natural England (GB), Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust (GB), Welsh Government (GB), Warneford Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Forest Research (GB), WWF-UK (GB), Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Woodland Trust (GB), University of Worcester (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Leverhulme Trust, University of Oxford, John Fell Fund, University of Oxford, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Research England
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.