Nonlinear association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and prevalent hypertension: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance contributes to hypertension, but the relationship with the novel non-insulin-based metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS‑IR) remains unclear, particularly regarding potential nonlinear patterns. METHODS: This cross‑sectional study included 1,592 participants. Associations between METS‑IR (continuous and tertiles) and prevalent hypertension were evaluated using logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and two‑piecewise regression, adjusting for age, sex, lifestyle factors, diabetes, and NAFLD. Subgroup analyses examined effect modification. RESULTS: Prevalent hypertension was present in 943 (59.2%). Each 1-unit increase in METS-IR was associated with higher hypertension odds (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08). A nonlinear relationship with an inflection point at 37.58 was identified. Below the inflection point (37.58), each 1-unit increase in METS-IR was associated with a 16.7% higher odds of hypertension (OR 1.167, 95% CI 1.082-1.259); above this point, the association was attenuated but remained significant (OR 1.038, 95% CI 1.007-1.069). Significant interactions were found for sex, BMI, diabetes, and NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: METS‑IR is independently and nonlinearly associated with prevalent hypertension, exhibiting a clear threshold effect. It may serve as a practical research indicator, particularly in individuals without overt metabolic disease, though causal inference requires prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06136-6
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonlinear association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and prevalent hypertension: a cross-sectional study

Y. Jiang, Wei Qin
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Nonlinear association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and prevalent hypertension: a cross-sectional study

Y. Jiang, Wei Qin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance contributes to hypertension, but the relationship with the novel non-insulin-based metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS‑IR) remains unclear, particularly regarding potential nonlinear patterns. METHODS: This cross‑sectional study included 1,592 participants. Associations between METS‑IR (continuous and tertiles) and prevalent hypertension were evaluated using logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and two‑piecewise regression, adjusting for age, sex, lifestyle factors, diabetes, and NAFLD. Subgroup analyses examined effect modification. RESULTS: Prevalent hypertension was present in 943 (59.2%). Each 1-unit increase in METS-IR was associated with higher hypertension odds (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08). A nonlinear relationship with an inflection point at 37.58 was identified. Below the inflection point (37.58), each 1-unit increase in METS-IR was associated with a 16.7% higher odds of hypertension (OR 1.167, 95% CI 1.082-1.259); above this point, the association was attenuated but remained significant (OR 1.038, 95% CI 1.007-1.069). Significant interactions were found for sex, BMI, diabetes, and NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: METS‑IR is independently and nonlinearly associated with prevalent hypertension, exhibiting a clear threshold effect. It may serve as a practical research indicator, particularly in individuals without overt metabolic disease, though causal inference requires prospective validation.

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Nantong University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.