Gaussian process-based methodology to analyze influencing factors on numerical fatigue assessment

Abstract The FKM guideline [1] provides a robust framework for numerical fatigue assessment, ensuring component safety against fatigue failure. Its accuracy depends critically on the underlying input parameters and their interactions. In practice, the parameters are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Global sensitivity analysis offers a rigorous, variance-based approach to quantify the influence of individual parameters and their interactions on the output of a model. This work proposes a workflow for numerical fatigue assessment under uncertainty. The workflow integrates a latent variable Gaussian process (LVGP) surrogate that simultaneously captures the effects of continuous FKM parameters, such as the ultimate tensile strength ( R m ), and the categorical influence of mesh refinement strategies. Finally, a Sobol sensitivity analysis is applied to the trained surrogate to quantify the contribution of each parameter to the variance in the utilization of the components. The methodology is demonstrated in three representative case studies, each using a different material and component. The resulting sensitivity rankings highlight the dominant role of material strength and mean stress effects under different loading ratios on the durability of components. Additionally, the results indicate that, within practical bounds, mesh discretization has a minimal impact on numerical fatigue assessment. The findings offer valuable insights for both uncertainty quantification and optimization of experimental campaigns in fatigue design, and they underscore the potential of mixed-variable surrogate-based sensitivity analysis in engineering practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Research
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-026-00941-3
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaussian process-based methodology to analyze influencing factors on numerical fatigue assessment

Felix-Christian Reissner, Christian Pittel, Julius Möller
Engineering Research
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Gaussian process-based methodology to analyze influencing factors on numerical fatigue assessment

Felix-Christian Reissner, Christian Pittel, Julius Möller
article en

Abstract

Abstract The FKM guideline [1] provides a robust framework for numerical fatigue assessment, ensuring component safety against fatigue failure. Its accuracy depends critically on the underlying input parameters and their interactions. In practice, the parameters are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Global sensitivity analysis offers a rigorous, variance-based approach to quantify the influence of individual parameters and their interactions on the output of a model. This work proposes a workflow for numerical fatigue assessment under uncertainty. The workflow integrates a latent variable Gaussian process (LVGP) surrogate that simultaneously captures the effects of continuous FKM parameters, such as the ultimate tensile strength ( R m ), and the categorical influence of mesh refinement strategies. Finally, a Sobol sensitivity analysis is applied to the trained surrogate to quantify the contribution of each parameter to the variance in the utilization of the components. The methodology is demonstrated in three representative case studies, each using a different material and component. The resulting sensitivity rankings highlight the dominant role of material strength and mean stress effects under different loading ratios on the durability of components. Additionally, the results indicate that, within practical bounds, mesh discretization has a minimal impact on numerical fatigue assessment. The findings offer valuable insights for both uncertainty quantification and optimization of experimental campaigns in fatigue design, and they underscore the potential of mixed-variable surrogate-based sensitivity analysis in engineering practice.

Engineering ResearchVol. 90(1)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.