Two decades of growth and trends in the FDA authorization of digital medical devices

The regulatory environment for digital medical devices has rapidly changed in recent years as policymakers have worked to keep up with the evolving landscape of biomedical technologies. Despite the need for new regulatory efforts, existing data assets in the US are not capable of systematically tracking whether FDA-authorized medical devices have digital components, limiting regulators' ability to incorporate software-specific considerations into post-market surveillance activities and limiting other stakeholders' ability to understand the extent of digitization of different medical specialty areas and product categories. We pioneer a new application of text analysis, using records from tens of thousands of regulatory documents for newly authorized medical devices, to describe the digital transformation of the US medical device industry over the past two decades. We show that the number of medical devices with digital components has grown substantially over time, with meaningful heterogeneity across clinical specialties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02692-5
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two decades of growth and trends in the FDA authorization of digital medical devices

Cirrus Foroughi, Melissa Ouellet, A. Stern, Alexander O. Everhart
npj Digital Medicine
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Two decades of growth and trends in the FDA authorization of digital medical devices

Cirrus Foroughi, Melissa Ouellet, A. Stern, Alexander O. Everhart
article en

Abstract

The regulatory environment for digital medical devices has rapidly changed in recent years as policymakers have worked to keep up with the evolving landscape of biomedical technologies. Despite the need for new regulatory efforts, existing data assets in the US are not capable of systematically tracking whether FDA-authorized medical devices have digital components, limiting regulators' ability to incorporate software-specific considerations into post-market surveillance activities and limiting other stakeholders' ability to understand the extent of digitization of different medical specialty areas and product categories. We pioneer a new application of text analysis, using records from tens of thousands of regulatory documents for newly authorized medical devices, to describe the digital transformation of the US medical device industry over the past two decades. We show that the number of medical devices with digital components has grown substantially over time, with meaningful heterogeneity across clinical specialties.

npj Digital Medicine
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Analysis Group (United States) (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.