A framework for conceptualizing agricultural diversification with a focus on the U.S. Corn Belt

CONTEXT Diversification of agricultural production has been proposed to address interrelated social, ecological, and economic challenges. However, definitions of agricultural diversification vary, and there has been negligible research documenting what farmers consider to be diversification. A shared understanding of agricultural diversification is needed to create common goals and support policies and programs that incorporate the vision of the agriculture community. OBJECTIVE We examine the meaning of agricultural diversification according to agricultural stakeholders with a focus on the U.S. Corn Belt. METHODS Data on farmer understandings of diversification from focus groups ( n = 20 groups) and a survey ( n = 725 respondents) across the U.S. states of Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana are compared to 1) a review of definitions of agricultural diversification found in academic and grey literature and 2) a definition created by a team of academics, Extension, and non-governmental professionals. RESULTS And CONCLUSION Five dimensions of agricultural diversity emerged: biological, economic, human, values, and cognitive. Across sources, diversification is typically discussed in biological and economic terms. Some sources mention values of conservation or sustainability as components of agricultural diversification and relatively fewer identify human dimensions. While the cognitive dimension of diversification did not emerge in the literature review, it was mentioned frequently by focus group participants. SIGNIFICANCE We provide a framework for understanding agricultural diversification and propose future efforts in this area define how the term is used across each of the five dimensions. Future outreach activities can leverage aspects of diversification that are compelling and achievable to farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104826
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for conceptualizing agricultural diversification with a focus on the U.S. Corn Belt

J. Arbuckle, L. S. Prokopy, R. Traldi, A. Torres et al.
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Economics and Policy
article

A framework for conceptualizing agricultural diversification with a focus on the U.S. Corn Belt

J. Arbuckle, L. S. Prokopy, R. Traldi, A. Torres, S. Harden, L. Asprooth, K. Floress, E. DeaKyne, S. Church, A. Thompson, A.J. Margenot, B. Gramig
article en

Abstract

CONTEXT Diversification of agricultural production has been proposed to address interrelated social, ecological, and economic challenges. However, definitions of agricultural diversification vary, and there has been negligible research documenting what farmers consider to be diversification. A shared understanding of agricultural diversification is needed to create common goals and support policies and programs that incorporate the vision of the agriculture community. OBJECTIVE We examine the meaning of agricultural diversification according to agricultural stakeholders with a focus on the U.S. Corn Belt. METHODS Data on farmer understandings of diversification from focus groups ( n = 20 groups) and a survey ( n = 725 respondents) across the U.S. states of Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana are compared to 1) a review of definitions of agricultural diversification found in academic and grey literature and 2) a definition created by a team of academics, Extension, and non-governmental professionals. RESULTS And CONCLUSION Five dimensions of agricultural diversity emerged: biological, economic, human, values, and cognitive. Across sources, diversification is typically discussed in biological and economic terms. Some sources mention values of conservation or sustainability as components of agricultural diversification and relatively fewer identify human dimensions. While the cognitive dimension of diversification did not emerge in the literature review, it was mentioned frequently by focus group participants. SIGNIFICANCE We provide a framework for understanding agricultural diversification and propose future efforts in this area define how the term is used across each of the five dimensions. Future outreach activities can leverage aspects of diversification that are compelling and achievable to farmers.

Agricultural SystemsVol. 238
University of Vermont (US), Landscape Institute (GB), The Nature Conservancy (US), University of Wisconsin System (US), US Forest Service (US), Economic Research Service (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Iowa State University (US), Montana State University (US), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.