Risk perceptions and protective behaviors at the onset and outset of the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract We study the formation of risk perceptions— subjective probability beliefs— of three adverse events—COVID-19 contagion, influenza contagion, and food poisoning—at the onset (2020) and outset (2023) of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. We show that perceived risk levels for COVID-19 are similar to those for influenza, are not significantly influenced by proximity to infection, and are shaped instead by an individual’s gender, education, and employment status. Using an instrumental variable strategy, we assess whether these perceptions influence a number of protective behaviors. We find that although risk perceptions are associated with various protective behaviors, they only causally increase the likelihood of phone or online medical consultations by about a percentage point.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-026-09492-y
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk perceptions and protective behaviors at the onset and outset of the COVID-19 pandemic

Melcior Rossello-Roig, Luca Salmasi, Joan Costa‐Font, Caroline Rudisill
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Risk Perception and Management
article

Risk perceptions and protective behaviors at the onset and outset of the COVID-19 pandemic

Melcior Rossello-Roig, Luca Salmasi, Joan Costa‐Font, Caroline Rudisill
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study the formation of risk perceptions— subjective probability beliefs— of three adverse events—COVID-19 contagion, influenza contagion, and food poisoning—at the onset (2020) and outset (2023) of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. We show that perceived risk levels for COVID-19 are similar to those for influenza, are not significantly influenced by proximity to infection, and are shaped instead by an individual’s gender, education, and employment status. Using an instrumental variable strategy, we assess whether these perceptions influence a number of protective behaviors. We find that although risk perceptions are associated with various protective behaviors, they only causally increase the likelihood of phone or online medical consultations by about a percentage point.

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of South Carolina (US), NHS England, London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
University of South Carolina, National Institutes of Health, Office of the Vice President for Research, University of South Carolina
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.